Abstract:Mendelian randomization (MR) implemented through instrumental variables analysis is an increasingly popular causal inference tool used in genetic epidemiology. But it can have limitations for evaluating simultaneous causal relationships in complex data sets that include, for example, multiple genetic predictors and multiple potential risk factors associated with the same genetic variant. Here we use real and simulated data to investigate Bayesian network analysis (BN) with the incorporation of directed arcs, representing genetic anchors, as an alternative approach. A Bayesian network describes the conditional dependencies/independencies of variables using a graphical model (a directed acyclic graph) with an accompanying joint probability. In real data, we found BN could be used to infer simultaneous causal relationships that confirmed the individual causal relationships suggested by bi-directional MR, while allowing for the existence of potential horizontal pleiotropy (that would violate MR assumptions). In simulated data, BN with two directional anchors (mimicking genetic instruments) had greater power for a fixed type 1 error than bi-directional MR, while BN with a single directional anchor performed better than or as well as bi-directional MR. Both BN and MR could be adversely affected by violations of their underlying assumptions (such as genetic confounding due to unmeasured horizontal pleiotropy). BN with no directional anchor generated inference that was no better than by chance, emphasizing the importance of directional anchors in BN (as in MR). Under highly pleiotropic simulated scenarios, BN outperformed both MR (and its recent extensions) and two recently-proposed alternative approaches: a multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test (SMUT) and a latent causal variable (LCV) test. We conclude that BN incorporating genetic anchors is a useful complementary method to conventional MR for exploring causal relationships in complex data sets such as those generated from modern "omics" technologies.

High-Dimensional Bayesian Network Inference From Systems Genetics Data Using Genetic Node Ordering

A modeling framework for detecting and leveraging node-level information in Bayesian network inference

Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data

High-order dynamic Bayesian Network learning with hidden common causes for causal gene regulatory network

Inference of regulatory networks through temporally sparse data

Bayesian Approaches for Large Biological Networks

A Canonical Correlation Analysis-Based Dynamic Bayesian Network Prior to Infer Gene Regulatory Networks from Multiple Types of Biological Data

Inferring gene networks with constrained regulatory nodes

Use of Bayesian networks to dissect the complexity of genetic disease: application to the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 simulated data

Joint network and node selection for pathway-based genomic data analysis.

A Full Bayesian Approach to Sparse Network Inference Using Heterogeneous Datasets

Bayesian Neural Networks for Genetic Association Studies of Complex Disease

Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks Based on Ordered Conditional Mutual Information and Limited Parent Nodes

Application of Bayesian Networks on Large-Scale Biological Data

Inferring genetic networks: An information theoretic approach

Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data

Using Pairwise Ordering Preferences to Estimate Causal Effects in Gene Expression from a Mixture of Observational and Intervention Experiments

Bayesian Structure Learning in Multi-layered Genomic Networks

Inducing Pairwise Gene Interactions from Time-Series Data by EDA Based Bayesian Network

A Sub-Space Greedy Search Method for Efficient Bayesian Network Inference.

Information theoretic approaches for inference of biological networks from continuous-valued data