An analysis of infections incidence of multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) rising in cervical and genital samples

Wen Hu,Xin-mei Liu,Meng-meng Guan,De-zhi Zhang,Xiao-jing Kang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19462/v1
2019-12-23
Abstract:Abstract Background : Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with cervical cancer and genital condyloma, which is mainly transmitted through sexual contact.Cervical HPV infection in females and genital HPV infection in males can induce epithelial proliferation on both mucosal and cutaneous surfaces. HPV is divided into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) types according to their oncogenic potential. The HR geneotypes are considered as etiological factors for invasive cervical cancer in females, and the LR geneotypes are correlated with hyperplastic lesions, including external genital warts, condyloma acuminata, and so on. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HPV infection and geneotype distribution among individuals in Xinjiang Province.Methods A total of 1094 patients the etiology and species with characteristic of cervical and genital warty surface which mainly come from CA in dermatology and STD outpatient service of People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.Using a method of real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR for the detection of human papilloma virus HPV 23 typing.Results The prevalence of HPV infection was 67.46%, the most common LR-HPV subtypes were HPV-6 (16.27%), HPV-11 (4.57%), HPV-42(1.19%) and HPV-43(1.19%), and HR-HPV subtypes were HPV-16 (1.65%) and HPV-58(0.91%). The prevalence of HPV infection with single subtype and multiple subtypes was 32.91% and 34.55%, respectively. Among the females infected with a single HPV subtype, 26.11% were infected with a HR-HPV subtype. Among the females infected with multiple HPV subtypes, 18.52% were infected with multiple HR-HR HPV subtypes. The prevalence and subtype distribution of HPV infection showedage differences ( P =0.012), and the prevalence peak of HPV infection was observed in females aged 20-29 years (292/404, 72.28%).Conclusion The prevalence of multiple infection was higher than singleinfection, and the prevalence varied significantly with age while had little association with race and gender.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?