Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

Digital Era Governance and Social Media

DIGITAL GOVERNANCE EMERGENCE AND IMPORTANCE

Community Adaptation in Facing the Digital Governance

Information and Communication Technology for Government by Design: The New Digital Media, Actors, Creative Influences, and Fields of Play

The Influence of Social Media on Public Administration

Digital Transformation of Diplomacy

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

Analysis of the Success of Implementing Digital Service Delivery in the Indonesian Public Sector: A Case Study on the Use of Online Public Service Applications

Public Policy in the Digital Era: Transformation of Political Communication

Digital Governance: Citizen Perceptions and Expectations of Online Public Services

Government Digital Transformation: Understanding the Role of Government Social Media

Shaping Public Perception: The Evolution of Government Public Relations in the Digital Age

Development of the Indonesian Government's Digital Transformation

Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services

Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation

IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN SABAH

Evolving Trends of Digital Diplomacy and its Role in the Achievement of Foreign Policy Goals

A Systematic Review of Social Media and Government in the Social Science Discipline

Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices

Digital Transformation of the Government: A Case Study in Indonesia

Digital media and its role in achieving sustainable development in contemporary societies / a theoretical approach