Abstract:The globalisation of higher institutions has led to the emergence of EMI courses offered by faculty with diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Existing literature has revealed that the cultural and linguistic backgrounds of English language teachers affect their teaching behaviour. However, this issue is relatively under-explored among EMI content teachers. This study explored 101 Chinese undergraduate students' perceptions of two categories of content teachers – native English-speaking EMI teachers and local (non-native English-speaking) EMI teachers – regarding their teaching behaviour and practices. Their perceptions were collected via a questionnaire survey and interviews, which were then triangulated by class observation of teachers' actual practices. Specifically, the students perceived that native English-speaking teachers adopted more interactive teaching approaches with diverse activities and various modalities of communication, but lacked intercultural competence. In comparison, local teachers obtained intra-cultural competence and thus could communicate with students about their learning difficulties. Their instruction was more intelligible but rather teacher-dominated. Students favoured interactive and efficient EMI courses with a primary focus on content. The findings provide insights for the implementation of the EMI curriculum and the development of EMI teachers' expertise.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in English - medium - instruction (EMI) classrooms in China, students' different perceptions of native English - speaking teachers (NESTs) and non - native English - speaking teachers (NNSTs) in terms of teaching behaviors and practices. Specifically, the research focuses on the following two aspects:
1. **What do Chinese college students think of the teaching behaviors of the two types of EMI teachers (NESTs and NNSTs)?**
- Through questionnaires, interviews and classroom observations, the research explored students' perceptions of these two types of teachers in terms of teaching style, content organization, language use and the effectiveness of EMI courses.
2. **What are the similarities and differences between the two types of EMI teachers in classroom teaching practices?**
- Through the observation of actual classrooms, the specific performances of the two types of teachers in terms of teaching methods, interaction forms, language use, etc. were analyzed.
### Research Background
With the development of the globalization trend, more and more higher education institutions use English as the medium of instruction for non - language academic courses (i.e., EMI). However, the cultural and linguistic backgrounds of EMI teachers may affect their teaching behaviors and effects. Although this issue has been widely discussed among English language teachers, it is still relatively less explored among EMI content teachers. Therefore, this research aims to fill this gap and provide references for the effective implementation of EMI courses and teacher professional development by comparing Chinese undergraduates' perceptions of the two types of EMI teachers.
### Research Methods
The research adopted multiple data sources, including questionnaires, interviews and classroom observations, to fully understand students' views on the two types of EMI teachers and verify students' perceptions through actual classroom observations.
- **Questionnaires**: Questionnaire data from 101 students were collected, covering 16 aspects such as teaching style, content organization, language issues and the effectiveness of EMI courses.
- **Interviews**: 12 students were selected for in - depth interviews to obtain more qualitative information.
- **Classroom Observations**: The actual teaching processes of one NEST and one NNST were observed, and their teaching behaviors were recorded and analyzed.
### Main Findings
1. **Teaching Style**:
- Students generally believe that NESTs are more inclined to adopt interactive teaching methods, the classroom atmosphere is more active, they use multiple - modal devices (such as PPT, video) to assist teaching, and they are more humorous.
- In contrast, NNSTs' teaching style is more traditional, with less classroom interaction and more reliance on the lecture method.
2. **Content Organization**:
- Although the questionnaire survey shows that the content arrangements of both types of teachers are relatively compact, some students pointed out in the interviews that NNSTs' course content arrangements are more intensive, the rhythm is faster, and higher - level cognitive thinking is required; while NESTs pay more attention to simplifying expressions to make the courses easier to understand.
3. **Language Use**:
- NESTs correct students' language mistakes more frequently, while NNSTs pay more attention to the correction of knowledge mistakes.
- NNSTs will use Chinese to explain complex concepts when necessary, which enhances the comprehensibility of teaching.
4. **Effectiveness of EMI Courses**:
- Students prefer EMI courses with strong interactivity and rich content, and hope that teachers can balance language and content teaching.
### Conclusion
This research reveals the different perceptions of Chinese undergraduates towards NESTs and NNSTs, and provides valuable references for the design of EMI courses and teacher training. In particular, the research emphasizes the importance of adjusting teaching methods according to different teacher backgrounds to improve the overall effectiveness of EMI courses.
### Formula Representation
This article does not involve specific mathematical, physical, chemical or biological formulas, so there is no need to present formulas in Markdown format.