Abstract:<p>We present the seventh report on the performance of methods for predicting the atomic resolution structures of protein complexes offered as targets to the community‐wide initiative on the Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions (CAPRI). Performance was evaluated on the basis of 36114 models of protein complexes submitted by 57 groups – including 13 automatic servers – in prediction Rounds held during the years 2016‐2019 for 8 protein‐protein, 3 protein‐peptide, and 5 protein‐oligosaccharide targets with different length ligands. Six of the protein‐protein targets represented challenging hetero‐complexes, due to factors such as availability of distantly related templates for the individual subunits, or for the full complex, inter‐domain flexibility, conformational adjustments at the binding region, or the multi‐component nature of the complex. The main challenge for the protein‐peptide and protein‐oligosaccharide complexes was to accurately model the ligand conformation and its interactions at the interface. Encouragingly, models of acceptable quality, or better, were obtained for a total of 6 protein‐protein complexes, which included 4 of the challenging hetero‐complexes and a homo‐decamer. But fewer of these targets were predicted with medium or higher accuracy. High accuracy models were obtained for 2 of the 3 protein‐peptide targets, and for one of the protein‐oligosaccharide targets. The remaining protein‐sugar targets were predicted with medium accuracy. Our analysis indicates that progress in predicting increasingly challenging and diverse types of targets is due to closer integration of template‐based modeling techniques with docking, scoring and model refinement procedures, and to significant incremental improvements in the underlying methodologies.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>

Modeling protein‐protein, protein‐peptide, and protein‐oligosaccharide complexes: CAPRI 7th edition

Blind Prediction of Homo‐ and Hetero‐protein Complexes: the CASP13‐CAPRI Experiment

Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template‐based modeling: a CASP‐CAPRI experiment

CAPRI-Q: The CAPRI resource evaluating the quality of predicted structures of protein complexes

Estimating protein complex model accuracy based on ultrafast shape recognition and deep learning in CASP15.

Impact of AlphaFold on structure prediction of protein complexes: The CASP15‐CAPRI experiment

Blind prediction of homo‐and hetero‐protein complexes: The CASP13‐CAPRI experiment

Community-Wide Assessment of Protein-Interface Modeling Suggests Improvements to Design Methodology

Modelling peptide–protein complexes: docking, simulations and machine learning

Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14‐CAPRI experiment

Author Response for "prediction of Protein Assemblies, the Next Frontier: the CASP14‐CAPRI Experiment"

Modeling beta‐sheet peptide‐protein interactions: Rosetta FlexPepDock in CAPRI rounds 38‐45

Integrative modeling in the age of machine learning: a summary of HADDOCK strategies in CAPRI rounds 47-55

Exploring the Binding Mechanism Between Human Profilin (PFN1) and Polyproline-10 Through Binding Mode Screening

Molecular Dynamics Scoring of Protein–Peptide Models Derived from Coarse-Grained Docking

Protein Target Highlights in CASP15: Analysis of Models by Structure Providers.

Template‐guided method for protein–ligand complex structure prediction: Application to CASP15 protein–ligand studies

ZDOCK predictions for the CAPRI challenge

Prediction of protein complex structure: methods and progress

Assessment of scoring functions for computational models of protein-protein interfaces

Improved Modeling of Peptide-Protein Binding Through Global Docking and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations