Abstract:With the acceleration of urbanization, traffic congestion and vehicle exhaust pollution are becoming increasingly serious problems. Focusing on the problem of urban pollution from vehicle exhaust, this study used system dynamics to establish an urban congestion mitigation and emission-reduction management model. Specifically, a nonlinear function that integrates system dynamics and a non-homogeneous discrete grey model (SD-NDGM) was used to construct an algorithm, which improved the accuracy of the model. Thereafter, the mid- and long-term effects of the restriction policy were explored. The main findings from dynamic model simulations were as follows: All types of restrictions alleviated traffic congestion to varying degrees, but "odd and even" restrictions had more obvious effects, with an average annual reduction rate of 43.53% in the number of motor vehicle trips. The driving-restriction policy had a time effect, significantly reducing the number of vehicle trips in the short term. However, it could have negative effects in the long term (e.g., agglomeration effect, emission-reduction paradox), and it does not fundamentally solve traffic and environmental problems. Thus, it could only be used as a phased policy, not a long-term measure. The purchase-restriction policy controlled excessive increases in the number of private cars, but it had little effect in terms of solving environmental problems. Compared with a single policy, the combination of public-transport development and driving-restriction policy not only reduced traffic congestion, air pollution, and air quality health indexes by 29.13%, 52.63%, and 54.63%, respectively, but also improved environmental carrying capacity by 294.26%. A combined approach can therefore be said to have certain benefits for society, health, and the environment.

Do driving restrictions improve air quality: Take Beijing-Tianjin for example?

Restricting Driving for Better Traffic and Clearer Skies: Did It Work in Beijing?

Do driving restriction policies effectively alleviate smog pollution in China?

The Pollution Haven Strikes Back?–evidence from Air Quality Daily Variation in the Jing-Jin-Ji Region of China

An Econometric Approach Toward Identifying the Relationship Between Vehicular Traffic and Air Quality in Beijing

Externalities from restrictions: Examining the short-run effects of urban core-focused driving restriction policies on air quality

Traffic Congestion, Ambient Air Pollution, and Health: Evidence from Driving Restrictions in Beijing

Sustainable Environmental Management: Evaluating the Effects of the Tail Number Restriction Policy on Air Quality in Lanzhou, China

Have mixed traffic restrictions improved air quality in different regions?

Will a Driving Restriction Policy Reduce Car Trips?—the Case Study of Beijing, China

Effects of vehicle purchase restrictions on urban air quality: Empirical study on cities in China

Assessing the effects of non-local traffic restriction policy on urban air quality

Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Eliminating High-Polluting Old Vehicles and Imposing Driving Restrictions to Reduce Vehicle Emissions in Beijing

The impacts of heterogeneous traffic regulation on air pollution: Evidence from China

Effect of Driving Restrictions on Travel Behavior in Beijing

Impact of New and Old Driving Force Conversion on Air Quality: Empirical Analysis Based on RDD

Effect of urban traffic-restriction policy on improving air quality based on system dynamics and a non-homogeneous discrete grey model

Can driving-restriction policies alleviate traffic congestion? A case study in Beijing, China

How Effective is the Regional Joint Environmental Policy in China? Evidence from Inverse Difference-in-Differences

Evaluating traffic emission control policies based on large-scale and real-time data: A case study in central China

Can China’s vehicular emissions regulation reduce air pollution?—a quasi-natural experiment based on the latest National Vehicular Emissions Standard (stage-VI)