Preclinical validation of the new vitrification device possessing a feature of absorbing excess vitrification solution for the cryopreservation of human embryos

Nozomi Takahashi,Miyuki Harada,Nagisa Oi,Gentaro Izumi,Kenji Momozawa,Atsushi Matsuzawa,Yukio Tokunaga,Tetsuya Hirata,Tomoyuki Fujii,Yutaka Osuga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14176
2020-01-10
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Abstract:AimThe cryopreservation of embryos is essential for assisted reproductive technology field. The aim of the present study is to examine the efficacy and ease of use of a new vitrification device, Kitasato Vitrification System (KVS), in cryopreservation of human embryos. MethodsHuman embryos at the cleavage or blastocyst stage were vitrified and warmed by KVS or Cryotop (control device). The survival of cleavage‐ and blastocyst‐stage embryos and the developmental competence of cleavage‐stage embryos were evaluated. Four individuals inexperienced in vitrification and warming embryos tested both KVS and Cryotop. The vitrification time and the detachment time of the embryos were evaluated. ResultsAt the cleavage stage, there were no significant differences in the survival rate and the development rate to the blastocyst stage between KVS and Cryotop (100 vs 96.8% and 63.3 vs 61.3%, respectively). At the blastocyst stage, there was no significant difference in the re‐expansion rate between KVS and Cryotop (100 vs 88.9%). The vitrification time was shorter for KVS than Cryotop. There was no significant difference in the detachment time between KVS and Cryotop. ConclusionKitasato Vitrification System is easy to operate, even for inexperienced users, and the viability of human embryos vitrified by KVS is comparable to that of Cryotop, a widely used vitrification device.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?