Abstract:News media plays a vital role in communicating scientific evidence to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such communication is important for convincing the public to follow social distancing guidelines and to respond to health campaigns such as vaccination programmes. However, newspapers were criticised that they focus on the socio-political perspective of science, without explaining the nature of scientific works behind the government's decisions. This paper examines the connections of the nature of science categories in the COVID-19 era by four local newspapers in the United Kingdom between November 2021 to February 2022. Nature of science refers to different aspects of how science works such as aims, values, methods and social institutions of science. Considering the news media may mediate public information and perception of scientific stories, it is relevant to ask how the various British newspapers covered aspects of science during the pandemic. In the period explored, Omicron variant was initially a variant of concern, and an increasing number of scientific evidence showed that the less severity of this variant might move the country from pandemic to endemic. We explored how news articles communicate public health information by addressing how science works during the period when Omicron variants surge. A novel discourse analysis approach, epistemic network analysis is used to characterise the frequency of connections of categories of the nature of science. The connection between political factors and the professional activities of scientists, as well as that with scientific practices are more apparent in left-populated and centralist outlets than in right-populated news outlets. Among four news outlets across the political spectrum, a left-populated newspaper, the Guardian, is not consistent in representing relations of different aspects of the nature of scientific works across different stages of the public health crisis. Inconsistency of addressing aspects of scientific works and a downplay of the cognitive-epistemic nature of scientific works likely lead to failure in trust and consumption of scientific knowledge by the public in the healthcare crisis.

Journalists and Science 2: diversity in the media coverage of the 2009 pandemic flu vaccine’s safety in France

[When health makes the headlines. Press, elite complicities and health globalisation in Bamako, Mali]

From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies

Asymmetric participation of defenders and critics of vaccines to debates on French-speaking Twitter

Journalists on COVID-19 Journalism: Communication Ecology of Pandemic Reporting

Scientific research in news media: a case study of misrepresentation, sensationalism and harmful recommendations

Disputes over the figures of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Epistemic diversity, dissemination of science, and political opposition

How is communication of vaccines in traditional media: a systematic review

[COVID-19 and medical publications: How three articles have influenced the media and public decisions in France]

Online on the frontline: A longitudinal social media analysis of UK healthcare workers' attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines using the 5C framework

Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis

Framing COVID-19 Preprint Research as Uncertain: A Mixed-Method Study of Public Reactions

Digital Pseudo-Identification in the Post-Truth Era: Exploring Logical Fallacies in the Mainstream Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Vaccines

[Consequences of opposition to vaccination in France and Europe. How to maintain effective vaccine coverage in 2010?]

Identity Emergence in the Context of Vaccine Criticism in France

Misinformation and Polarization around COVID-19 vaccines in France, Germany, and Italy

Context matters: How to research vaccine attitudes and uptake after the COVID-19 crisis

The production of health news by the press: the context of the coverage of the 2007/2008 yellow fever epidemic

Media Representations of Science during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis of News and Social Media on the Island of Ireland

Writing about COVID-19 vaccines: Emotional profiling unravels how mainstream and alternative press framed AstraZeneca, Pfizer and vaccination campaigns

Gender and Prestige Bias in Coronavirus News Reporting