Development of frailty subtypes and their associated risk factors among the community-dwelling elderly population

Yan Zhang,Xiu-Juan Xu,Ting-Yu Lian,Ling-Feng Huang,Jin-Mei Zeng,Dong-Mei Liang,Ming-Juan Yin,Jing-Xiao Huang,Liang-Chang Xiu,Zu-Wei Yu,Yu-Lian Li,Chen Mao,Jin-Dong Ni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102671
2020-01-16
Aging
Abstract:In order to explore frailty subtypes and find their associated risk factors, we conducted cross-sectional surveys of 5,341 seniors aged 60 and over in China using the Frailty Index (FI) scale. We identified four frailty subtypes, namely multi-frail, cognitive and functionally frail, psychologically frail and physiologically frail. Old age and low education level were the common risk factors among the four subtypes. Being widowed, divorced or unmarried was a risk factor for multi-frail, cognitive and functionally frail and psychologically frail, and male sex was a protective factor against cognitive and functionally frail and psychologically frail subtypes. Having a harmonious relationship with family was a protective factor against multi-frail, and fewer visits to the elderly by their children was a risk factor for psychologically frail. Dissatisfaction with their housing was a risk factor for cognitive and functionally frail, psychologically frail and physiologically frail, and a pension being the main source of income was a risk factor for cognitive and functionally frail and psychologically frail. Exercising every day was a protective factor against multi-frail and cognitive and functionally frail, and a lower level of physical activity was a risk factor for all four frailty subtypes. Our findings confirm the heterogeneity of frailty and suggest that different frail elderly individuals need more targeted care interventions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?