Even NHANES evolves: Some surprising findings about women who have sex with women.
J. Marrazzo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e658d3
2010-06-01
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Abstract:T most quoted and reliable estimates of lifetime same-sex behavior among women and men are derived from population-based surveys of representative samples of adults in the United States and the United Kingdom. These efforts have not always been linked with biomedical markers of sexually transmitted infection in participants; however, in the United States, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) have provided the principal window into populationbased trends in herpes simplex virus (HSV) seroprevalence in adults since the survey first reported on this outcome in 1989.1 In this issue of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Xu et al take several steps forward in this area with their analysis of NHANES 2001–2006 data.2 Using audio computerassisted self-interview (A-CASI) obtained from women ages 18 to 59 years, these investigators assessed participants’ report of recent and lifetime same-sex behavior. In addition, a subset of these women, ages 18 to 49 years, had type-specific serologic testing for HSV that, as they point out, can serve as a valuable surrogate marker for cumulative lifetime sexual risk. As I write this in 2010, the fact that this is the first time NHANES has reported on same-sex behavior in its participants is noteworthy in itself, but why does this particular study warrant a full editorial? The numbers generated by the analysis are impressive in themselves: the percentage of participants who reported ever having had sex with another woman translates to 5.7 million (95% confidence interval, 4.9–6.6), a number that will serve as a useful denominator for future analyses and that emphasizes the normative aspects of this behavior. Moreover, more than half of all respondents who reported having sex with another woman in their lifetime identified themselves as heterosexual, including 25% who reported having had sex with another woman in the prior year. These findings are very good reminders that equating sexual behavior to sexual identity—a tendency still evident in many clinical interactions and some guidelines—is neither reliable nor advisable, and is essentially scientifically irresponsible. While the analysis highlights other interesting and novel information, including the considerably higher number of lifetime male sex partners among women who self-identified as bisexual, 2 other findings deserve comment. First, how does the prevalence of same-sex behavior reported by NHANES participants compare to that of other large, population-based studies? In the NHANES group, 7.1% of women reported ever having had sex with a woman (95% confidence interval, 6.1–8.2), significantly lower than the 11.2% reported in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (another large, United States population-based survey),3 but higher than the 4.9% reported in the United Kingdom’s National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (NATSAL 2000, 1999–2001).4 It is unlikely that the true prevalence differs greatly between the United States and the United Kingdom, but several factors may have contributed to these discrepancies: interviewing methodology, phrasing of survey questions, and the changing sociopolitical climate. Using CASI has been shown to increase the frequency of reporting of potentially stigmatized behaviors; paradoxically, CASI was not used in the National Survey of Family Growth study, but was employed in both NHANES and NATSAL. The phrasing of questions regarding sexual practices differed: as Xu et al note, the National Survey of Family Growth study asked participants about “a sexual experience,” the definition of which could conceivably be open to interpretation, whereas NHANES and NATSAL asked more specifically about sexual practice. And lastly, timing is everything—particularly in reference to generational attitudinal shifts. Report of any lifetime same-sex behavior in NHANES was considerably higher in younger women, peaking at 9.4% in ages 18 to 29 years, and in fact, was negatively correlated with increasing age. The higher overall prevalence of lifetime same-sex behavior in this age group has been suggested by other data, and may truly reflect that times really are changing: more open attitudes and evident tolerance for homosexuality has likely created a freer climate for young women to pursue and to report sexual relationships with other women—if they so desire.