Ambivalent effects of leader's organizational political behavior on subordinate's organizational citizenship behavior: a dyadic study
Hyo Rim Kwon,Jeong Hoon Seol,Yun Jin Kang,Young Woo Sohn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07074-2
IF: 2.8
2024-11-30
Current Psychology
Abstract:This study aimed to elucidate the dynamics of organizational politics (OP). We investigated the ambivalent relationship between leaders' political behavior (PB) and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), focusing on the mediating role of trust in the leader. Additionally, the study explored the moderating effect of a leader's ethics on these relationships. We employed a cross-sectional dyadic survey design, collecting data from 160 leader-subordinate pairs across 79 Korean companies. The researchers and a survey company conducted sampling using the researchers' professional networks and the company's pool of participants. Leaders and subordinates completed structured online questionnaires, with leaders assessing subordinates' OCB and subordinates evaluating their leaders' PB, trust, and ethics. The measurement model was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), and hypothesis testing was conducted through path analysis with Mplus version 7.4. Results show that leaders' hard PB negatively impacts subordinates' OCB whereas soft PB has a positive impact, and trust in the leader mediates these relationships. Moreover, the leader's ethical level moderates the effect of leader PB on trust in the leader. Specifically, as leader ethics are high, the negative effect of hard PB and the positive effect of soft PB on trust in the leader are both strengthened. The findings suggest that organizations should encourage leaders to engage in soft PB to foster trust and enhance OCB, while minimizing hard PB to prevent detrimental impacts. Furthermore, aligning ethical leadership with appropriate PB is essential, as subordinates are sensitive to inconsistencies between leaders' values and actions. To build trust effectively, organizations should promote the integration of high ethical standards with soft PB, rather than focusing solely on ethics. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
psychology, multidisciplinary