A Comparison Between Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide as Reinforcement Agents in Polypropylene Nanocomposite Using Irradiated Polypropylene as Compatibilizer

Carlos Soares,Julyana Santana,Olgun Güven,Esperidiana A. B. Moura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36628-5_36
2020-01-01
Abstract:PolypropyleneNanocompositePolypropylene material with the best mechanical resistance ever encountered. Various types of studies have been carried out on possible applications. The use as a reinforcement in Nanocomposite has shown to be a promising field, but some studies indicate that the Graphene oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) have better results as reinforcement, due to the functional groups, which allow a better adhesion with the matrix. This study analyzes the production of Polypropylene (PP) Nanocomposite comparing the use of Graphene oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) as fillers and irradiated Polypropylene as a coupling agent. A twin-screw extruder and injection molding machine were used to produce the Nanocomposite PP reinforced with 0.2 wt% Graphene oxideReduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) by melt blending. Graphene oxideReduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) were X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis. The Nanocomposite samples were X-ray Diffraction (XRD), SEM, TG, DSC and Mechanical tests.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?