Prenatal ultrasound findings of holoprosencephaly spectrum: Unusual associations

Sara H. El‐Dessouky,Mona M. Aboulghar,Hassan M. Gaafar,Rana M. Abdella,Marwa F. Sharaf,Mohamed I. Ateya,Ahmed Ezz Elarab,Walaa H. Zidan,Rania M. Helal,Samah M. Aboelsaud,Maha M. Eid,Ghada M.H. Abdel‐Salam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5649
2020-02-10
Prenatal Diagnosis
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the prenatal diagnosis, postnatal characteristics and the spectrum of associated findings in fetuses with holoprosencephaly (HPE). MethodsFetal neurosonograms, postnatal assessment and chromosomal analysis were performed in a cohort of 25 fetuses with HPE. ResultsThe prevalence of HPE in high risk pregnancies was 4.4:10.000. The alobar subtype was the most frequently encountered, with 17 cases (68%). Interestingly, among them 4 cases (16%) presented with the rare agnathia‐otocephaly complex. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 11 cases (44%), the most frequent being trisomy 13 in 7 cases (5 alobar, 1 semilobar and 1 lobar HPE) followed by Trisomy 18 in 2 cases with semilobar HPE. One case of alobar HPE had 45,XX,t(18;22) (q10;q10),‐18p karyotyping, and one case of semilobar HPE was associated with triploidy.. Facial malformations in HPE spectrum ranged from cyclopia, proboscis, and arrhinia, that were associated with the alobar subtype, to hypotelorism and median cleft, that were frequent among the semilobar and lobar subtypes. Associated neural tube defects were identified in 12% of cases. ConclusionOur study illustrates the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of HPE and describes different chromosomal abnormalities associated with HPE.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
genetics & heredity,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?