Abstract:Introduction Provisional prosthetic restorations play a crucial role in dentistry by protecting dentinal tubules, offering thermal insulation, and ensuring a precise fit during dental treatments. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) have improved polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), enhancing its mechanical properties such as hardness and resistance compared to traditional methods. However, bacterial accumulation remains a challenge due to inherent surface roughness. This study aims to assess and compare Streptococcus mutans adhesion on milled PMMA and conventional self-cure acrylic resin, providing insights into their microbial interaction dynamics. Materials and methods This study was a prospective trial approved by the Institutional Human Ethical Committee (SRB-IHEC) (registration number: IHEC/SDC/PROSTHO-2104/24/045) and registered in the Clinical Trial Registry, India (registration number: CTRI/2024/05/068196). The study involved 20 patients requiring single crowns in the right and left molar regions. Two groups were established: Group I (the milled PMMA group) and Group II (the conventional PMMA group). Criteria for participant selection and exclusion were set. A total of 120 swab samples from the buccal mucosa and tooth surfaces were collected before tooth preparation (the baseline) at one week and three weeks. Culture for S. mutans was done, and colony-forming units were counted. Data analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). An independent sample t-test was employed to compare the two materials for crowns. To analyze changes over time within each group, a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. When the ANOVA test indicated significance, Tukey's post-hoc test was utilized for pairwise mean comparison. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results The mean colony-forming units (CFU) counts for the milled PMMA group were 4.46 ± 0.167 CFU at baseline, 4.163 ± 0.058 CFU at one week, and 3.87 ± 0.19 CFU at three weeks. The mean CFU counts for the conventional PMMA group were 4.41 ± 0.13 CFU at baseline, 4.29 ± 0.114 CFU at one week, and 4.16 ± 0.108 CFU at three weeks. At baseline (before cementation), there was no difference between milled PMMA and conventional PMMA (P = 0.578). After one week, a significant difference between milled PMMA and conventional PMMA was observed (P < 0.005). After three weeks, a significant difference between milled PMMA and conventional PMMA persisted (P < 0.005). Conclusion There was a significant reduction in microbial adhesion in both the milled and conventional PMMA groups. However, milled PMMA demonstrated a greater decrease in microbial adhesion as compared to conventional PMMA.

Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial

Assessment of microbial adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars

Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia and Stainless-Steel crowns in Primary Molars - A Randomized Control Trial

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Provisional Crowns Fabricated With Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Conventional Acrylic Resin: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Clinical and radiographic assessment of zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in restoration of primary molars

An In Vivo Investigation of Non-Metallic vs. Metallic Hand Scalers on Zirconia Implant-Supported Crowns: A Year-Long Analysis of Peri-Implant Maintenance

Gingival health, plaque accumulation, and restoration outcomes in deciduous anterior teeth: evaluating zirconia crowns versus composite resin strip crowns

Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial

Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Formation on Temporization Crown Materials Used in the Rehabilitation of Primary Dentition With Different Polishing Materials: An In Vitro Study

Screw-retained monolithic zirconia vs. cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns: a prospective randomized clinical trial in split-mouth design

Clinical and immunological evaluation of peri-implant tissues around ultra-polished and conventionally-polished zirconia abutments. A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial

Comparison of peri-implant submucosal microbiota in arches with zirconia or titanium implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of Peri-Implant Submucosal Microbiota in Arches with Zirconia or Titanium Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Initial bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on novel restorative materials used in paediatric dentistry

Preformed Stainless-Steel Crowns: Their Effects on Oral Hygiene Maintenance and Gingival Health - A Prospective Original Research

Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dental Biofilm Accumulation and Gingival Health of Teeth with Fixed Single Prosthesis Fabricated by Various Prosthetic Materials

Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long‐term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants

Monolithic zirconia as a valid alternative to metal-ceramic for implant-supported single crowns in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Of the article: evaluation of the masticatory efficiency of children with stainless steel crowns: a pilot cross-sectional split-mouth study