Endothelial Protective Effects of Defibrotide Reduce Acute Graft Versus Host Disease after Experimental Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Senthilnathan Palaniyandi,Reena Kumari,Ethan Strattan,Timothy Huang,Jing Du,Melissa Kesler,Gerhard C. Hildebrandt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.125
2020-03-01
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Abstract:Introduction Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The pathophysiology of acute GVHD involves donor T cell- and inflammatory cytokine-mediated injury to the patient's tissues and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Defibrotide is a mixture of single stranded nucleotides that has a number of pharmacological effects that contribute to its endothelial protective properties. We hypothesized that preventive treatment with defibrotide will reduce the incidence and severity of GVHD due to its endothelial protective and anti-inflammatory properties and potentially does not alter graft versus leukemia (GVL) responses. Methods Recipient B10.BR mice received Cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg per day on day-3 and -2, and received lethal total body irradiation (750cGy) on day 0, followed by the infusion of donor C57BL/6 T-cell depleted bone marrow cells. To induce GVHD, respective groups were co-infused with splenocytes, while non-GVHD controls received BM cells only. Mice were treated with defibrotide at the dose of 800mg/kg per body weight or vehicle control for the first week daily and then three times/week thereafter. For GVL experiments, C57BL/6 recipients were lethally irradiated (12Gy) with TBI and transplanted with C3H.SW donor TCD bone marrow alone or in combination with 3 million T-cells along with C1498-luc and treated with defibrotide or vehicle controls. Results Allogeneic defibrotide treated recipients demonstrated significantly better survival when compared to control group (83.34% vs 54.55% on day +28). Clinical GVHD scores were significantly worse after day +14 in control group when compared to defibrotide treated recipients. Both at day +7 and on day +28 allogeneic defibrotide treated recipients showed significantly less organ GVHD in gut, lung and liver (p<0.05). Reduced pathology scores on day +28 associated with significantly decreased T-cell infiltration in ileum and colon. Serum cytokine analysis at day +7 revealed significantly reduced level of TNF (p<0.05) and IL-6 (p=0.05) in allogeneic defibrotide treated recipients. Analysis on day +28 revealed reduced serum levels of ICAM-1 (p<0.05), Angiopoietin-2 (p<0.05) and reduced VCAM-1 (p<0.05) in gut of allogeneic defibrotide group. In GVL model, defibrotide treatment after allo-HSCT resulted in improved survival at week. Whole-animal analysis of disease progression measured via luciferase activity indicated that there was an increased time of disease-free survival (DFS) after defibrotide treatment (14 days median DFS vs 24.5 days median DFS). No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made, rendering reported p-values as nominal. Conclusion Defibrotide treatment through its anti-inflammatory and endothelium-protective effects reduces the incidence and severity of acute GVHD, while not impairing GVL activity.
biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?