Abstract:OBJECTIVE Sociodemographic disparities in health outcomes are well documented, but the effects of such disparities on preoperative presentation of pituitary adenomas (PA) and surgical outcomes following resection are not completely understood. In this study the authors sought to compare the preoperative clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing PA resection at a private hospital (PH) versus a safety-net hospital (SNH). METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review over a 36-month period of patients with PAs who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery performed by the same attending neurosurgeon at either a PH or an SNH at a single academic medical institution. RESULTS A total of 92 PH patients and 69 SNH patients were included. SNH patients were more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid (88.4% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001). A larger percentage of SNH patients were Hispanic (98.7% vs 32.6% p < 0.0001), while PH patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic white (39.1% vs 4.3%, p < 0.0001). SNH patients had a larger mean PA diameter (26.2 vs 22.4 mm, p = 0.0347) and a higher rate of bilateral cavernous sinus invasion (13% vs 4.3%, p = 0.0451). SNH patients were more likely to present with headache (68.1% vs 45.7%, p = 0.0048), vision loss (63.8% vs 35.9%, p < 0.0005), panhypopituitarism (18.8% vs 4.3%, p = 0.0031), and pituitary apoplexy (18.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.0334). Compared to PH patients, SNH patients were as likely to undergo gross-total resection (73.9% vs 76.1%, p = 0.7499) and had similar rates of postoperative improvement in headache (80% vs 89%, p = 0.14) and vision (82% vs 84%, p = 0.74), but had higher rates of postoperative panhypopituitarism (23% vs 10%, p = 0.04) driven by preoperative endocrinopathies. Although there were no differences in tumor recurrence or progression, loss to follow-up was seen in 7.6% of PH versus 18.6% (p = 0.04) of SNH patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients presenting to the SNH were more often uninsured or on Medicaid and presented with larger, more advanced pituitary tumors. SNH patients were more likely to present with headaches, vision loss, and apoplexy, likely translating to greater improvements in headache and vision observed after surgery. These findings highlight the association between medically underserved populations and more advanced disease states at presentation, and underscore the likely role of academic tertiary multidisciplinary care teams and endoscopic PA resection in somewhat mitigating sociodemographic factors known to portend poorer outcomes, though longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Tumors in the United States, 2009 to 2011: Effects of Hospital Volume on Postoperative Complications

Improvement in the Quality of Early Postoperative Course after Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Description of Surgical Technique and Outcome

Current trends in surgical approach and outcomes following pituitary tumor resection

Clinical and Operative Risk Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay After Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Predictive value of pituitary tumor morphology on outcomes and complications in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery

Volume-Cost Relationship in Neurosurgery: Analysis of 12,129,029 Admissions from the National Inpatient Sample

Prospective Study of Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: is Tumor Volume a Predictor for the Residual Tumor?

Surgical Outcomes and Predictors of Visual Function Alterations after Transcranial Surgery for Large-to-Giant Pituitary Adenomas

The Effect of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Pituitary Surgery

Transsphenoidal Surgery of Giant Pituitary Adenoma: Results and Experience of 239 Cases in A Single Center

Comparative preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes at a private versus a safety-net hospital following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas

The Evolution of Pituitary Surgery in an Australian Health Care Framework

Complications associated with microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: experience of 1153 consecutive cases treated at a single tertiary care pituitary center.

The surgical management of third ventricle region tumors

Improvement and Effect Analysis of a New Neuroendoscopic Trans-Nasal-sphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Resection Approach

The impact of facility type and volume on treatment and overall survival in craniopharyngioma

295 High Volume Centers Provide Superior Value of Care in the Surgical Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumor

Trends in the surgical management of parapharyngeal space tumors: A single-center retrospective analysis

The Volume-Outcomes Effect in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Hospital Versus Surgeon Contributions and Specificity of the Relationship

Impact of facility volume on survival in primary endoscopic surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma

Procedural volume is linearly associated with mortality, major complications, and readmissions in patients undergoing malignant brain tumor resection