Practical calculation of mean, pooled variance, variance, and standard deviation, in meta-analysis studies

Mahdieh Arian,Mohsen Soleimani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v7i1.2294

2020-01-22

Nursing Practice Today

Abstract:The article's abstract is no available.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis

Sean McGrath,XiaoFei Zhao,Russell Steele,Brett D. Thombs,Andrea Benedetti,DEPRESsion Screening Data,Collaboration

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080

2019-03-26

Abstract:Researchers increasingly use meta-analysis to synthesize the results of several studies in order to estimate a common effect. When the outcome variable is continuous, standard meta-analytic approaches assume that the primary studies report the sample mean and standard deviation of the outcome. However, when the outcome is skewed, authors sometimes summarize the data by reporting the sample median and one or both of (i) the minimum and maximum values and (ii) the first and third quartiles, but do not report the mean or standard deviation. To include these studies in meta-analysis, several methods have been developed to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the reported summary data. A major limitation of these widely used methods is that they assume that the outcome distribution is normal, which is unlikely to be tenable for studies reporting medians. We propose two novel approaches to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation when data are suspected to be non-normal. Our simulation results and empirical assessments show that the proposed methods often perform better than the existing methods when applied to non-normal data.

Statistics
Ten circumstances and solutions for finding the sample mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02217-1

2023-04-02

Systematic Reviews

Abstract:A common problem in meta-analyses is the unavailability of mean and standard deviation (SD). Unfortunately, only having values of the median, interquartile range (IQR), or range cannot be directly utilized for meta-analysis. Although some estimation and conversion methods have been proposed in the past two decades, there were no published and user-friendly tools developed based on multiple scenarios of missing SD. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a collection of possible circumstances of missing sample means or SD with solutions for teaching and research. A total of 10 common circumstances of missing SD or mean could have available statistics of p value, t value, z score, confidence interval, standard error, median, IQR, and range. Teachers and investigators can use relevant formulas for finding the sample mean and SD according to the available circumstance. Due to the complicated computations, our team provides a free available spreadsheet. With ever-evolving statistical methods, some formulas may be further improved in the future; therefore, it is recommended to involve statisticians in evidence-based practice or systematic reviews.

medicine, general & internal
Improved Ratio Type Estimators of Population Mean Based on Median of a Study Variable and an Auxiliary Variable

Muhammad Irfan,Maria Javed,Muhammad Abid,Zhengyan Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15672/hjms.201613720025

2018-01-01

Abstract:This paper deals with efficient ratio type estimators for estimating finite population mean under simple random sampling scheme by using the knowledge of known median of a study and an auxiliary variable. Expressions for the bias and mean squared error of the proposed ratio type estimators are derived up to first order of approximation. It is found that our proposed estimators perform better as compared to the traditional ratio estimator, regression estimator, Subramani and Kumarapandiyan [23], Subramani and Prabavathy [24] and Yadav et al. [28] estimators. In addition, theoretical findings are verified with the help of real data sets.
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

Xiang Wan,Wenqian Wang,Jiming Liu,Tiejun Tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.8038

2016-10-05

Abstract:In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, researchers often pool the results of the sample mean and standard deviation from a set of similar clinical trials. A number of the trials, however, reported the study using the median, the minimum and maximum values, and/or the first and third quartiles. Hence, in order to combine results, one may have to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation for such trials. In this paper, we propose to improve the existing literature in several directions. First, we show that the sample standard deviation estimation in Hozo et al. (2005) has some serious limitations and is always less satisfactory in practice. Inspired by this, we propose a new estimation method by incorporating the sample size. Second, we systematically study the sample mean and standard deviation estimation problem under more general settings where the first and third quartiles are also available for the trials. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed methods greatly improve the existing methods and enrich the literature. We conclude our work with a summary table that serves as a comprehensive guidance for performing meta-analysis in different situations.

Methodology
How to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary?

Jiandong Shi,Dehui Luo,Hong Weng,Xian-Tao Zeng,Lu Lin,Tiejun Tong

2018-01-04

Abstract:In some clinical studies, researchers may report the five number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation. To conduct meta-analysis for pooling studies, one needs to first estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary. A number of studies have been proposed in the recent literature to solve this problem. However, none of the existing estimators for the standard deviation is satisfactory for practical use. After a brief review of the existing literature, we point out that Wan et al.'s method (BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135, 2014) has a serious limitation in estimating the standard deviation from the five number summary. To improve it, we propose a smoothly weighted estimator by incorporating the sample size information and derive the optimal weight for the new estimator. For ease of implementation, we also provide an approximation formula of the optimal weight and a shortcut formula for estimating the standard deviation from the five number summary. The performance of the proposed estimator is evaluated through two simulation studies. In comparison with Wan et al.'s estimator, our new estimator provides a more accurate estimate for normal data and performs favorably for non-normal data. In real data analysis, our new method is also able to provide a more accurate estimate of the true sample standard deviation than the existing method. In this paper, we propose an optimal estimator of the standard deviation from the five number summary. Together with the optimal mean estimator in Luo et al. (Stat Methods Med Res, in press, 2017), our new methods have improved the existing literature and will make a solid contribution to meta-analysis and evidence-based medicine.

Statistics
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from order statistics and sample size in meta-analysis

Siyu Cai,Jie Zhou,Jianxin Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802211047348

IF: 2.494

2021-10-20

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Abstract:In recent years, a growing number of researchers have attempted to overcome the constraints of size and scope in different medical studies to find out the overall treatment effects. As a widespread technique to combine results of multiple studies, commonly used meta-analytic approaches for continuous outcomes demand sample means and standard deviations of primary studies, which are absent sometimes, especially when the outcome is skewed. Instead, the median, the extrema, and/or the quartiles are reported. One feasible solution is to convert the preceding order statistics to demanded statistics to keep effect measures consistent. In this article, we propose new methods based on maximum likelihood estimation for known distributions with unknown parameters. For unknown underlying distributions, the Box–Cox transformation is applied to the reported order statistics so that the techniques for normal distribution can be utilized. Two approaches for estimating the power parameter in Box–Cox transformation are provided. Both simulation studies and real data analysis indicate that in most cases, the proposed methods outperform the existing methods in estimation accuracy.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics,mathematical & computational biology,statistics & probability
Generalized Box-Cox method to estimate sample mean and standard deviation for Meta-analysis

Olivia Xiao,Stacy Wang,Min Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.15497

2023-10-24

Abstract:Meta-analysis is the aggregation of data from multiple studies to find patterns across a broad range relating to a particular subject. It is becoming increasingly useful to apply meta-analysis to summarize these studies being done across various fields. In meta-analysis, it is common to use the mean and standard deviation from each study to compare for analysis. While many studies reported mean and standard deviation for their summary statistics, some report other values including the minimum, maximum, median, and first and third quantiles. Often, the quantiles and median are reported when the data is skewed and does not follow a normal distribution. In order to correctly summarize the data and draw conclusions from multiple studies, it is necessary to estimate the mean and standard deviation from each study, considering variation and skewness within each study. In past literature, methods have been proposed to estimate the mean and standard deviation, but do not consider negative values. Data that include negative values are common and would increase the accuracy and impact of the me-ta-analysis. We propose a method that implements a generalized Box-Cox transformation to estimate the mean and standard deviation accounting for such negative values while maintaining similar accuracy.

Methodology
Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review

Christopher J. Weir,Isabella Butcher,Valentina Assi,Stephanie C. Lewis,Gordon D. Murray,Peter Langhorne,Marian C. Brady

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0483-0

2018-03-07

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Abstract:BackgroundRigorous, informative meta-analyses rely on availability of appropriate summary statistics or individual participant data. For continuous outcomes, especially those with naturally skewed distributions, summary information on the mean or variability often goes unreported. While full reporting of original trial data is the ideal, we sought to identify methods for handling unreported mean or variability summary statistics in meta-analysis.MethodsWe undertook two systematic literature reviews to identify methodological approaches used to deal with missing mean or variability summary statistics. Five electronic databases were searched, in addition to the Cochrane Colloquium abstract books and the Cochrane Statistics Methods Group mailing list archive. We also conducted cited reference searching and emailed topic experts to identify recent methodological developments. Details recorded included the description of the method, the information required to implement the method, any underlying assumptions and whether the method could be readily applied in standard statistical software. We provided a summary description of the methods identified, illustrating selected methods in example meta-analysis scenarios.ResultsFor missing standard deviations (SDs), following screening of 503 articles, fifteen methods were identified in addition to those reported in a previous review. These included Bayesian hierarchical modelling at the meta-analysis level; summary statistic level imputation based on observed SD values from other trials in the meta-analysis; a practical approximation based on the range; and algebraic estimation of the SD based on other summary statistics. Following screening of 1124 articles for methods estimating the mean, one approximate Bayesian computation approach and three papers based on alternative summary statistics were identified. Illustrative meta-analyses showed that when replacing a missing SD the approximation using the range minimised loss of precision and generally performed better than omitting trials. When estimating missing means, a formula using the median, lower quartile and upper quartile performed best in preserving the precision of the meta-analysis findings, although in some scenarios, omitting trials gave superior results.ConclusionsMethods based on summary statistics (minimum, maximum, lower quartile, upper quartile, median) reported in the literature facilitate more comprehensive inclusion of randomised controlled trials with missing mean or variability summary statistics within meta-analyses.

health care sciences & services
Two-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians

Sean McGrath,Hojoon Sohn,Russell Steele,Andrea Benedetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900036

2018-09-05

Abstract:We consider the problem of meta-analyzing two-group studies that report the median of the outcome. Often, these studies are excluded from meta-analysis because there are no well-established statistical methods to pool the difference of medians. To include these studies in meta-analysis, several authors have recently proposed methods to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the median, sample size, and several commonly reported measures of spread. Researchers frequently apply these methods to estimate the difference of means and its variance for each primary study and pool the difference of means using inverse variance weighting. In this work, we develop several methods to directly meta-analyze the difference of medians. We conduct a simulation study evaluating the performance of the proposed median-based methods and the competing transformation-based methods. The simulation results show that the median-based methods outperform the transformation-based methods when meta-analyzing studies that report the median of the outcome, especially when the outcome is skewed. Moreover, we illustrate the various methods on a real-life data set.

Methodology
Practical Meta-Analysis

M. Lipsey,David B. Wilson

2000-08-18

Abstract:Introduction Problem Specification and Study Retrieval Selecting, Computing and Coding the Effect Size Statistic Developing a Coding Scheme and Coding Study Reports Data Management Analysis Issues and Strategies Computational Techniques for Meta-Analysis Data Interpreting and Using Meta-Analysis Results

Mathematics,Computer Science
Understanding variability: the role of meta-analysis of variance

Oliver D. Howes,George E. Chapman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001971

IF: 10.592

2024-10-05

Psychological Medicine

Abstract:Meta-analyses traditionally compare the difference in means between groups for one or more outcomes of interest. However, they do not compare the spread of data (variability), which could mean that important effects and/or subgroups are missed. To address this, methods to compare variability meta-analytically have recently been developed, making it timely to review them and consider their strengths, weaknesses, and implementation. Using published data from trials in major depression, we demonstrate how the spread of data can impact both overall effect size and the frequency of extreme observations within studies, with potentially important implications for conclusions of meta-analyses, such as the clinical significance of findings. We then describe two methods for assessing group differences in variability meta-analytically: the variance ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). We consider the reporting and interpretation of these measures and how they differ from the assessment of heterogeneity between studies. We propose general benchmarks as a guideline for interpreting VR and CVR effects as small, medium, or large. Finally, we discuss some important limitations and practical considerations of VR and CVR and consider the value of integrating variability measures into meta-analyses.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical
Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting medians

Sean McGrath,Stephan Katzenschlager,Alexandra J. Zimmer,Alexander Seitel,Russell Steele,Andrea Benedetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802221139233

2022-06-29

Abstract:We consider the setting of an aggregate data meta-analysis of a continuous outcome of interest. When the distribution of the outcome is skewed, it is often the case that some primary studies report the sample mean and standard deviation of the outcome and other studies report the sample median along with the first and third quartiles and/or minimum and maximum values. To perform meta-analysis in this context, a number of approaches have recently been developed to impute the sample mean and standard deviation from studies reporting medians. Then, standard meta-analytic approaches with inverse-variance weighting are applied based on the (imputed) study-specific sample means and standard deviations. In this paper, we illustrate how this common practice can severely underestimate the within-study standard errors, which results in overestimation of between-study heterogeneity in random effects meta-analyses. We propose a straightforward bootstrap approach to estimate the standard errors of the imputed sample means. Our simulation study illustrates how the proposed approach can improve estimation of the within-study standard errors and between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, we apply the proposed approach in a meta-analysis to identify risk factors of a severe course of COVID-19.

Methodology
Informal Caregivers and Care Burden in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohammadreza Amiresmaili,Reza Goudarzi,Leila Agoush

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_343_21

2023-11-09

Abstract:Background: The increase in the average age of the population, the decrease in the size of the household and rising in the number of working women impose an increasing burden on home caregivers in Iran. The aim of this study was to measure care burden of informal caregivers in Iran through systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted by using national and international databases of Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SID, Magiran, and IranDoc papers in English and Persian language up to the first half of 2020. In this meta-analysis, we calculated the pooled care burden and 95% confidence intervals in Statistical Software For Data Science (STATA) V.15. Results: Forty-four papers were included in the current study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria comprising of 8626 samples. Pooled mean of Burden of Care was 52.01 (95% CI: 48.21-55.82). Highest pooled mean(SD) of care burden (64.37) was related to caregivers of schizophrenia patients (95% CI: 56.09-72.64). Highest care burden (53.45) was observed in most deprived areas (95%CI = 47.05-59.86). A statistically significant relationship was observed between caregivers gender and care burden (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The reported care burden of informal caregivers requires the establishment of a support system to control mental and physical stress. Due to the dispersion and cultural diversity in Iran, more studies are needed to obtain more accurate data.
Estimating Mean and Standard Deviation from the Sample Size, Three Quartiles, Minimum, and Maximum

Martin Bland,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.01.6

2015-01-27

International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research

Abstract:Background: We sometimes want to include in a meta-analysis data from studies where results are presented as medians and ranges or interquartile ranges rather than as means and standard deviations. In this paper I extend a method of Hozo et al. to estimate mean and standard deviation from median, minimum, and maximum to the case where quartiles are also available. Methods: Inequalities are developed for each observation using upper and lower limits derived from the minimum, the three quartiles, and the maximum. These are summed to give bounds for the sum and hence the mean of the observations, the average of these bounds in the estimate. A similar estimate is found for the sum of the observations squared and hence for the variance and standard deviation. Results: For data from a Normal distribution, the extended method using quartiles gives good estimates of sample means but sample standard deviations are overestimated. For data from a Lognormal distribution, both sample mean and standard deviation are overestimated. Overestimation is worse for larger samples and for highly skewed parent distributions. The extended estimates using quartiles are always superior in both bias and precision to those without. Conclusions: The estimates have the advantage of being extremely simple to carry out. I argue that as, in practice, such methods will be applied to small samples, the overestimation may not be a serious problem.
One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians

Sean McGrath,XiaoFei Zhao,Zhi Zhen Qin,Russell Steele,Andrea Benedetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8013

2017-12-16

Abstract:An aggregate data meta-analysis is a statistical method that pools the summary statistics of several selected studies to estimate the outcome of interest. When considering a continuous outcome, typically each study must report the same measure of the outcome variable and its spread (e.g., the sample mean and its standard error). However, some studies may instead report the median along with various measures of spread. Recently, the task of incorporating medians in meta-analysis has been achieved by estimating the sample mean and its standard error from each study that reports a median in order to meta-analyze the means. In this paper, we propose two alternative approaches to meta-analyze data that instead rely on medians. We systematically compare these approaches via simulation study to each other and to methods that transform the study-specific medians and spread into sample means and their standard errors. We demonstrate that the proposed median-based approaches perform better than the transformation-based approaches, especially when applied to skewed data and data with high inter-study variance. In addition, when meta-analyzing data that consists of medians, we show that the median-based approaches perform considerably better than or comparably to the best-case scenario for a transformation approach: conducting a meta-analysis using the actual sample mean and standard error of the mean of each study. Finally, we illustrate these approaches in a meta-analysis of patient delay in tuberculosis diagnosis.

Statistics
Application of Standardized Regression Coefficient in Meta-Analysis

Pentti Nieminen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics2030028

2022-08-31

BioMedInformatics

Abstract:The lack of consistent presentation of results in published studies on the association between a quantitative explanatory variable and a quantitative dependent variable has been a long-term issue in evaluating the reported findings. Studies are analyzed and reported in a variety of ways. The main purpose of this review is to illustrate the procedures in summarizing and synthesizing research results from multivariate models with a quantitative outcome variable. The review summarizes the application of the standardized regression coefficient as an effect size index in the context of meta-analysis and describe how it can be estimated and converted from data presented in original research articles. An example of synthesis is provided using research articles on the association between childhood body mass index and carotid intima-media thickness in adult life. Finally, the paper shares practical recommendations for meta-analysts wanting to use the standardized regression coefficient in pooling findings.
Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta‐analysis

Lifeng Lin,Ariel M. Aloe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8781

2020-11-12

Statistics in Medicine

Abstract:Meta‐analyses of a treatment's effect compared with a control frequently calculate the meta‐effect from standardized mean differences (SMDs). SMDs are usually estimated by Cohen's d or Hedges' g. Cohen's d divides the difference between sample means of a continuous response by the pooled standard deviation, but is subject to nonnegligible bias for small sample sizes. Hedges' g removes this bias with a correction factor. The current literature (including meta‐analysis books and software packages) is confusingly inconsistent about methods for synthesizing SMDs, potentially making reproducibility a problem. Using conventional methods, the variance estimate of SMD is associated with the point estimate of SMD, so Hedges' g is not guaranteed to be unbiased in meta‐analyses. This article comprehensively reviews and evaluates available methods for synthesizing SMDs. Their performance is compared using extensive simulation studies and analyses of actual datasets. We find that because of the intrinsic association between point estimates and standard errors, the usual version of Hedges' g can result in more biased meta‐estimation than Cohen's d. We recommend using average‐adjusted variance estimators to obtain an unbiased meta‐estimate, and the Hartung‐Knapp‐Sidik‐Jonkman method for accurate estimation of its confidence interval.

public, environmental & occupational health,medicine, research & experimental,medical informatics,mathematical & computational biology,statistics & probability
A meta-analysis on the relationship between media with violence and aggression in Iranian sports

Abbas Nazarian Madavani,Masumeh Shahbazi,Hadi Bayat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2023.2288823

2024-03-19

Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse

Abstract:The present research aimed to conduct a systematic study on violence and aggression in the context of Iranian sports and perform a meta-analysis to investigate the association between the media and violence and aggression in sports. The research encompassed all relevant studies available in scientific databases within Iran (such as Magiran, Seyed, Civilica, Normagz, Humane resource study, and police publications), as well as dissertations from the information and scientific documents database. The selected timeframe for this analysis covered the years 2001 to 2018 in the Iranian context. Through this process, 209 studies related to the subject were identified, out of which 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis based on the research protocol investigating the relationship between media and violence and aggression in sports. Data analysis was performed using SPSS25 and CMA2 software. The results showed several variables played prominent roles in the researches on violence and aggression in sports, including media performance, referees' performance, stadium amenities, law enforcement and security factors, external and internal stadium environment, coach's behavior, social control, family influence, education, socio-economic factors, substance abuse, players' behavior, influence of friends, managerial aspects, and cultural and political factors. Inferential statistics indicated effect size for the relationship between media and violence and aggression, under the fixed model, was determined to be 0.259, and under the random model, it was 0.306, both of which were statistically significant. Consequently, based on the findings from the meta-analysis, a significant direct relationship between media and violence and aggression in sports was established.

substance abuse
Simulation models for aggregated data meta-analysis: Evaluation of pooling effect sizes and publication biases

Edwin R van den Heuvel,Osama Almalik,Zhuozhao Zhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231206474

IF: 2.494

2024-03-11

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Abstract:Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print. Simulation studies are commonly used to evaluate the performance of newly developed meta-analysis methods. For methodology that is developed for an aggregated data meta-analysis, researchers often resort to simulation of the aggregated data directly, instead of simulating individual participant data from which the aggregated data would be calculated in reality. Clearly, distributional characteristics of the aggregated data statistics may be derived from distributional assumptions of the underlying individual data, but they are often not made explicit in publications. This article provides the distribution of the aggregated data statistics that were derived from a heteroscedastic mixed effects model for continuous individual data and a procedure for directly simulating the aggregated data statistics. We also compare our simulation approach with other simulation approaches used in literature. We describe their theoretical differences and conduct a simulation study for three meta-analysis methods: DerSimonian and Laird method for pooling aggregated study effect sizes and the Trim & Fill and precision-effect test and precision-effect estimate with standard errors method for adjustment of publication bias. We demonstrate that the choice of simulation model for aggregated data may have an impact on (the conclusions of) the performance of the meta-analysis method. We recommend the use of multiple aggregated data simulation models to investigate the sensitivity in the performance of the meta-analysis method. Additionally, we recommend that researchers try to make the individual participant data model explicit and derive from this model the distributional consequences of the aggregated statistics to help select appropriate aggregated data simulation models.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics,mathematical & computational biology,statistics & probability
The Relationship Among the Standard Deviation of a Dataset and the Standard Deviation and Average Two Part of This Set

Jose Fausto de Morais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.0850

2012-02-04

Abstract:Meta-analysis involves combining summary information for related but independent studies. It uses different relationship to combine position measure as well as dispersion measures. The objective of this study is to discuss a relationship among the standard deviation of a data set and the standard deviation and mean of two part of this set. The problem was proposed in a systematic review with meta-analysis that combined two studies with missing data.

Methodology

Practical calculation of mean, pooled variance, variance, and standard deviation, in meta-analysis studies

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis

Ten circumstances and solutions for finding the sample mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis

Improved Ratio Type Estimators of Population Mean Based on Median of a Study Variable and an Auxiliary Variable

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

How to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation from the five number summary?

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from order statistics and sample size in meta-analysis

Generalized Box-Cox method to estimate sample mean and standard deviation for Meta-analysis

Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review

Two-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians

Practical Meta-Analysis

Understanding variability: the role of meta-analysis of variance

Standard error estimation in meta-analysis of studies reporting medians

Informal Caregivers and Care Burden in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Estimating Mean and Standard Deviation from the Sample Size, Three Quartiles, Minimum, and Maximum

One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians

Application of Standardized Regression Coefficient in Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta‐analysis

A meta-analysis on the relationship between media with violence and aggression in Iranian sports

Simulation models for aggregated data meta-analysis: Evaluation of pooling effect sizes and publication biases

The Relationship Among the Standard Deviation of a Dataset and the Standard Deviation and Average Two Part of This Set