Abstract:Abstract The platform economy and its leading firms, such as Amazon, Facebook and Google, are reorganising the geography of value creation and capture on both a local and global scale. This article argues that economic geographers have underappreciated the implications of the platform on space. First, we demonstrate the concentration of platform giants in terms of location on the US West Coast and in terms of their market share in various services, such as search, maps and online sales. Platforms are simultaneously intermediaries, two-sided markets, data aggregators and leading users of artificial intelligence (AI). Second, we use a labour taxonomy to demonstrate the extensive reach of these platforms in terms of the labour markets that they serve and shape. To illustrate these changes in the geography of value creation, we present case studies of Amazon and Google Maps to show their effects on the location of economic activity. Third, we elaborate on our contention that platforms are at once intermediaries and data hubs. AI is likely to reinforce the power of these platform leaders because they have the largest data sets, the most computational power, enormous teams of the best AI researchers and vast reservoirs of capital that they can use to make acquisitions. We conclude by identifying areas for future research and calling upon economic geographers to consider the implications of the platform economy in reshaping the space of economic activity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore how the platform economy reshapes the spatial relationship between value creation and acquisition. Specifically, the author focuses on the following issues:
1. **Geographical concentration**: The paper analyzes the high geographical concentration of platform giants, especially on the west coast of the United States (such as Silicon Valley and Seattle). These platform companies have a huge global market influence, but their headquarters and main business activities are concentrated in a few regions, which leads to a high concentration of wealth and power.
2. **Market structure**: The paper discusses the characteristics of the market structure in the platform economy, especially how a few companies dominate in various service areas (such as search, maps, online sales, etc.). This market concentration not only reflects the strong market power of platform companies, but also reveals the mechanism by which they further consolidate this advantage through data aggregation and artificial intelligence technology.
3. **Impact on the labor market**: The paper explores the role of the platform economy in restructuring the labor market, including the forms of labor within platform companies (such as full - time employees, contract workers), platform - dependent jobs (such as online sales, personal service provision, remote service provision, etc.), and user - generated content. These new forms of labor and work patterns not only change the distribution of the labor force, but also affect the process of value creation.
4. **Intermediary role of the platform economy**: The paper emphasizes the role of the platform as an intermediary and data hub, especially in connecting users and service providers, collecting and using big data, and applying artificial intelligence. These functions enable platform companies to play an increasingly important role in economic activities, and also trigger discussions about data privacy and market monopoly.
5. **Future research directions**: Finally, the paper calls on economic geographers to pay attention to the impact of the platform economy on the spatial organization of economic activities and proposes future research directions, including how the platform economy will further reshape the spatial distribution of the labor market, market competition patterns, etc.
In summary, this paper aims to reveal how the platform economy has deeply influenced the spatial relationship between value creation and acquisition through geographical concentration, market structure, labor market restructuring, and intermediary roles, and calls on scholars to further explore research issues in this field.