Engineered Application of a Weighted Fracturing Fluid in Deep Water
J. Bagal,N. M. Gurmen,R. A. Holicek,B. R. Gadiyar,C. N. Fredd,Joseph Bagal,M. Nihat Gurmen,Robert Andrew Holicek,Balkrishna R. Gadiyar,Christopher N. Fredd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/98348-ms
2006-02-15
Abstract:Abstract Over the past decade, operators in offshore fields such as the Gulf of Mexico and West Africa have increased their investment in deepwater projects. The trend is expected to continue in the future. For frac and pack operations in deep water, the industry is facing some particular challenges that limit completion options. A major challenge is the need to reduce the surface treating pressure to stay within current equipment operating limits. One solution is to increase the fluid density, thereby allowing for a reduction in the surface pressure while generating the same bottomhole pressure. However, higher fluid densities can also lead to higher friction pressures that may overcome the hydrostatic benefits. In addition, as the water depth increases, the travel time to the mudline increases, resulting in the need for extended crosslink delay times. Therefore, fluids that provide flexibility in density and extended crosslink delay times are required for effective treatment designs in deep water. This paper describes a weighted, delayed crosslink polymer (WDC) fluid and engineering guidelines for its use in frac and pack applications. Sodium bromide is used as the weighting agent to provide higher densities (8.3 to 12.5 ppg) compared to conventional fluids. Additionally, the fluid has a delayed crosslink that can be controlled from 2 to 20 minutes, which helps in limiting the tubing friction. Extensive laboratory testing was performed to ensure the technical feasibility and effectiveness of the WDC fluid. Tests included polymer hydration in brine, crosslink delay time measurements, rheology at bottom-hole static temperatures, shear sensitivity, fluid stability at mudline temperatures, breaker design, leakoff characteristics and matrix cleanup, proppant-pack conductivity, and friction pressure tests. Results demonstrate that the WDC fluid meets all performance requirements. It is stable at mudline temperatures down to 40 °F, and effective at bottom-hole temperatures of at least 250 °F. An engineering simulator wasdeveloped based on completion characteristics to select the weighted fluid in cases where it can be beneficial. Example case histories are presented that demonstrate conditions under which weighted fluids provides a reduction in treating pressure. The WDC fluid has shown the ability to reduce the treating pressure by at least 20% depending on the wellbore configuration. The strong dependence of treating pressure on completion geometry, fluid density, and crosslink delay time necessitates evaluation of each treatment on a well-by-well basis to determine effective applications of weighted fluids. Introduction Historically, deepwater projects started in the mid 1970s. The first successes were achieved in the mid 1980s, and the development gained momentum in the last part of the 1990s in the Gulf of Mexico and in West Africa with the discovery of a substantial number of giant fields. Over the last decade, the major operators in the Gulf of Mexico have increased their deepwater investment. For the upcoming years, the trend is expected to continue because of the favorable reservoir conditions encountered in this region. Frac and packs are generally the sandface completion of choice for these reservoirs as they provide low skin and optimum recovery. Deepwater applications, however, present some unique challenges relative to common fracturing fluid designs. In deep water, the fluid is exposed to a very wide temperature range over a short time. The fluid may cool to as low as 40 °F at the mudline, but subsequently warm up again as it passes the mudline and heads toward the perforations. These temperature variations have a critical role in crosslink performance and breaker design. A fracturing fluid design must account for these changes for optimum performance. Usually, deep wells require higher bottomhole treating pressures to create a hydraulic fracture. Applying pressure at surface may increase the sandface pressure, however, the amount of pressure that can be applied at surface is limited due to the nature of the equipment used in fracturing. Some current completions are pushing the limits with surface pressures near the capacity of normal treating equipment. Future reservoirs, at greater depths and higher pressures, will eventually require surface pressures in excess of the current equipment limitations of 15,000 psi. Two options are available to address this pressure limitation without changing the pump rate:reduce the tubing friction and/orincrease the hydrostatic pressure.