Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors

Etienne J. P Maes,Melissa J. Sharpe,Alexandra A. Usypchuk,Megan Lozzi,Chun Yun Chang,Matthew P. H. Gardner,Geoffrey Schoenbaum,Mihaela D. Iordanova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0574-1
IF: 25
2020-01-20
Nature Neuroscience
Abstract:Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well established as prediction errors. However, the central tenet of temporal difference accounts—that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors—remains untested. In the present communication we addressed this by showing that optogenetically shunting dopamine activity at the start of a reward-predicting cue prevents second-order conditioning without affecting blocking. These results indicate that cue-evoked transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions. Maes et al. use second-order conditioning, blocking and optogenetic inhibition to show that cue-evoked dopamine transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?