Abstract:Although large citation databases such as Web of Science and Scopus are widely used in bibliometric research, they have several disadvantages, including limited availability, poor coverage of books and conference proceedings, and inadequate mechanisms for distinguishing among authors. We discuss these issues, then examine the comparative advantages and disadvantages of other bibliographic databases, with emphasis on (a) discipline-centered article databases such as EconLit, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX, and (b) book databases such as Amazon.com, Books in Print, Google Books, and OCLC WorldCat. Finally, we document the methods used to compile a freely available data set that includes five-year publication counts from SocINDEX and Amazon along with a range of individual and institutional characteristics for 2,132 faculty in 426 U.S. departments of sociology. Although our methods are time-consuming, they can be readily adopted in other subject areas by investigators without access to Web of Science or Scopus (i.e., by faculty at institutions other than the top research universities). Data sets that combine bibliographic, individual, and institutional information may be especially useful for bibliometric studies grounded in disciplines such as labor economics and the sociology of professions. Policy highlightsWhile nearly all research universities provide access to Web of Science or Scopus, these databases are available at only a small minority of undergraduate colleges. Systematic restrictions on access may result in systematic biases in the literature of scholarly communication and assessment.The limitations of the largest citation databases influence the kinds of research that can be most readily pursued. In particular, research problems that use exclusively bibliometric data may be preferred over those that draw on a wider range of information sources.Because books, conference papers, and other research outputs remain important in many fields of study, journal databases cover just one component of scholarly accomplishment. Likewise, data on publications and citation impact cannot fully account for the influence of scholarly work on teaching, practice, and public knowledge.The automation of data compilation processes removes opportunities for investigators to gain first-hand, in-depth understanding of the patterns and relationships among variables. In contrast, manual processes may stimulate the kind of associative thinking that can lead to new insights and perspectives.

Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity

Global Maps of Science Based on the New Web-of-Science Categories

Web of Science and Scopus language coverage

The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough

Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics

A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers

Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus

Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS

Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis

The field-specific citation and usage patterns of book literature in the Book Citation Index

The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study

Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

Bibliometrics and visualization analysis of EwE model based on CiteSpace

Information Sciences 1968–2016: A Retrospective Analysis with Text Mining and Bibliometric

Web of Science Core Collection's coverage expansion:The forgotten Arts & Humanities Citation Index?

Computer Science Papers in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliometric Analysis of Statistics Journals Indexed in Web of Science Under Emerging Source Citation Index

The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis