Prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor breast cancer: a systematic review

Tim C. de Ruijter,Frank van der Heide,Kim M. Smits,Maureen J. Aarts,Manon van Engeland,Vivianne C. G. Heijnen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-1250-9
2020-01-31
Breast Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Background In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, differentiating between patients with a low and a high risk of recurrence is an ongoing challenge. In current practice, prognostic clinical parameters are used for risk prediction. DNA methylation markers have been proven to be of additional prognostic value in several cancer types. Numerous prognostic DNA methylation markers for breast cancer have been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE to assess the number and level of evidence of published DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To obtain an overview of the reporting quality of the included studies, all were scored according to the REMARK criteria that were established as reporting guidelines for prognostic biomarker studies. Results A total of 74 studies were identified reporting on 87 different DNA methylation markers. Assessment of the REMARK criteria showed variation in reporting quality of the studies. Eighteen single markers and one marker panel were studied in multiple independent populations. Hypermethylation of the markers RASSF1 , BRCA , PITX2 , CDH1 , RARB , PCDH10 and PGR , and the marker panel GSTP1 , RASSF1 and RARB showed a statistically significant correlation with poor disease outcome that was confirmed in at least one other, independent study. Conclusion This systematic review provides an overview on published prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and identifies eight markers that have been independently validated. Analysis of the reporting quality of included studies suggests that future research on this topic would benefit from standardised reporting guidelines.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?