Neurons in Visual Cortex are Driven by Feedback Projections when their Feedforward Sensory Input is Missing

Andreas J Keller,Morgane M Roth,Massimo Scanziani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.24.919142
2020-01-25
Abstract:We sense our environment through pathways linking sensory organs to the brain. In the visual system, these feedforward pathways define the classical feedforward receptive field (ffRF), the area in space where visual stimuli excite a neuron 1 . The visual system also uses visual context, the visual scene surrounding a stimulus, to predict the content of the stimulus 2 , and accordingly, neurons have been found that are excited by stimuli outside their ffRF 3–8 . The mechanisms generating excitation to stimuli outside the ffRF are, however, unclear. Here we show that feedback projections onto excitatory neurons in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) generate a second receptive field driven by stimuli outside the ffRF. Stimulating this feedback receptive field (fbRF) elicits slow and delayed responses compared to ffRF stimulation. These responses are preferentially reduced by anesthesia and, importantly, by silencing higher visual areas (HVAs). Feedback inputs from HVAs have scattered receptive fields relative to their putative V1 targets enabling the generation of the fbRF. Neurons with fbRFs are located in cortical layers receiving strong feedback projections and are absent in the main input layer, consistent with a laminar processing hierarchy. The fbRF and the ffRF are mutually antagonistic since large, uniform stimuli, covering both, suppress responses. While somatostatin-expressing inhibitory neurons are driven by these large stimuli, parvalbumin and vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-expressing inhibitory neurons have antagonistic fbRF and ffRF, similar to excitatory neurons. Therefore, feedback projections may enable neurons to use context to predict information missing from the ffRF and to report differences in stimulus features across visual space, regardless if excitation occurs inside or outside the ffRF. We have identified a fbRF which, by complementing the ffRF, may contribute to predictive processing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?