Amelie Haugg,Fabian M. Renz,Andrew A. Nicholson,Cindy Lor,Sebastian J. Gotzendorfer,Ronald Sladky,Stavros Skouras,Amalia McDonald,Cameron Craddock,Lydia Hellrung,Matthias Kirschner,Marcus Herdener,Yury Koush,Marina Papoutsi,Jackob Keynan,Talma Hendler,Kathrin Cohen Kadosh,Catharina Zich,Simon H. Kohl,Manfred Hallschmid,Jeff MacInnes,R. Alison Adcock,Kathryn C. Dickerson,Nan-Kuei Chen,Kymberly Young,Jerzy Bodurka,Michael Marxen,Shuxia Yao,Benjamin Becker,Tibor Auer,Renate Schweizer,Gustavo Pamplona,Ruth A. Lanius,Kirsten Emmert,Seven Haller,Dimitri van de Ville,Dong-Youl Kim,Jong-Hwan Lee,Theo Marins,Fukuda Megumi,Bettina Sorger,Tabea Kamp,Sook-Lei Liew,Ralf Veit,Maartje Spetter,Nikolaus Weiskopf,Frank Scharnowski,David Steyrl

Abstract:Real-time fMRI neurofeedback is an increasingly popular neuroimaging technique that allows an individual to gain control over his/her own brain signals, which can lead to improvements in behavior in healthy participants as well as to improvements of clinical symptoms in patient populations. However, a considerably large ratio of participants undergoing neurofeedback training do not learn to control their own brain signals and, consequently, do not benefit from neurofeedback interventions, which limits clinical efficacy of neurofeedback interventions. As neurofeedback success varies between studies and participants, it is important to identify factors that might influence neurofeedback success. Here, for the first time, we employed a big data machine learning approach to investigate the influence of 20 different design-specific (e.g. activity vs. connectivity feedback), region of interest-specific (e.g. cortical vs. subcortical) and subject-specific factors (e.g. age) on neurofeedback performance and improvement in 608 participants from 28 independent experiments. With a classification accuracy of 60% (considerably different from chance level), we identified two factors that significantly influenced neurofeedback performance: Both the inclusion of a pre-training no-feedback run before neurofeedback training and neurofeedback training of patients as compared to healthy participants were associated with better neurofeedback performance. The positive effect of pre-training no-feedback runs on neurofeedback performance might be due to the familiarization of participants with the neurofeedback setup and the mental imagery task before neurofeedback training runs. Better performance of patients as compared to healthy participants might be driven by higher motivation of patients, higher ranges for the regulation of dysfunctional brain signals, or a more extensive piloting of clinical experimental paradigms. Due to the large heterogeneity of our dataset, these findings likely generalize across neurofeedback studies, thus providing guidance for designing more efficient neurofeedback studies specifically for improving clinical neurofeedback-based interventions. To facilitate the development of data-driven recommendations for specific design details and subpopulations the field would benefit from stronger engagement in open science research practices and data sharing.

Just a very expensive breathing training? Risk of respiratory artefacts in functional connectivity-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback

Feasibility of training the dorsolateral prefrontal-striatal network by real-time fMRI neurofeedback

Analysis methods for real-time fMRI neurofeedback

P.1.j.025 Effects of Acute Stress and Anxiety Induced by the Inhalation of Air Enriched with CO2 on Model-Based and Model-Free Behaviour

Data-Driven Approach to the Analysis of Real-Time FMRI Neurofeedback Data: Disorder-Specific Brain Synchrony in PTSD.

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: the promising potential of brain-training technology to advance clinical neuroscience

Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates

Determinants of Real-Time Fmri Neurofeedback Performance and Improvement – a Machine Learning Mega-Analysis

Predictors of real-time fMRI neurofeedback performance and improvement – A machine learning mega-analysis

A Real-Time Method to Reduce Ballistocardiogram Artifacts from EEG During Fmri Based on Optimal Basis Sets (OBS)

From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments

Optimizing spatial specificity and signal quality in fNIRS: an overview of potential challenges and possible options for improving the reliability of real-time applications

The Effect of Low-Frequency Physiological Correction on the Reproducibility and Specificity of Resting-State fMRI Metrics: Functional Connectivity, ALFF, and ReHo

Self-regulation of local brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

Single Subject Task‐related BOLD Signal Artifact in a Real‐time Fmri Feedback Paradigm

Brain-wide functional connectivity artifactually inflates throughout functional magnetic resonance imaging scans

Targeting the superior temporal gyrus with real-time fMRI neurofeedback: A pilot study of the indirect effects on self-referential processes in schizophrenia

Strategies for motion- and respiration-robust estimation of fMRI intrinsic neural timescales

Investigating the variability of physiological response functions across individuals and brain regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging

Low Frequency Systemic Hemodynamic “Noise” in Resting State BOLD fMRI: Characteristics, Causes, Implications, Mitigation Strategies, and Applications

The efficacy of resting-state fMRI denoising pipelines for motion correction and behavioural prediction.