Abstract:Abstract Background Teleological reasoning is a cognitive bias purported to disrupt student ability to understand natural selection. Few studies have described pedagogical efforts to decrease student endorsement of teleological reasoning and measure the effects of this attenuation on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. This exploratory study examined the influence of explicit instructional activities directly challenging student endorsement of teleological explanations for evolutionary adaptations on their learning of natural selection over a semester-long undergraduate course in evolutionary medicine. In a convergent mixed methods design this study combined pre- and post-semester survey data (N = 83) on understanding natural selection, student endorsement of teleological reasoning, and acceptance of evolution, with thematic analysis of student reflective writing on their understanding and acceptance of natural selection and teleological reasoning. Results Student endorsement of teleological reasoning decreased and understanding and acceptance of natural selection increased during a course on human evolution with teleological intervention (p ≤ 0.0001), compared to a control course. Endorsement of teleological reasoning was predictive of understanding of natural selection prior to the semester. Thematic analysis revealed that prior to the course students were largely unaware of the concept of teleological reasoning and their own tendency to think about evolution in a purpose-directed way, but perceived attenuation of their own teleological reasoning by the end of the semester. Conclusions This exploratory study provides initial evidence that class activities to directly challenge student endorsement of unwarranted design teleological reasoning reduces the level and effects of teleological reasoning in an evolution course. Students were unaware of their high levels of endorsement of teleological reasoning upon entrance into the undergraduate human evolution course, which is consequential because teleological reasoning is a predicter of natural selection understanding. As a result of developed anti-teleological pedagogy, students had decreased unwarranted teleological reasoning and increased acceptance and understanding of natural selection over the course of the semester. The data presented show that students are receptive to explicit instructional challenges to their teleological reasoning and that attenuation of this bias is associated with gains in natural selection understanding and acceptance.

Teleology and the intentions of supernatural agents

The design stance, intentional stance, and teleological beliefs about biological and nonbiological natural entities.

Reasons Things Happen for a Reason: An Integrative Theory of Teleology

Teleology’s long shadow

An externalist teleology

Playing for God’s Team: The Influence of Belief in the Supernatural on Perceptions of Religious, Spiritual, and Natural Cues

TELEOLOGY PAST AND PRESENT

Resolving teleology’s false dilemma

Who Engages with Supernatural Entities? An Investigation of Personality and Cognitive Style Predictors

Why is the Teleological Argument so Popular?

Excessive teleological thinking is driven by aberrant associations and not by failure of reasoning

The impact of direct challenges to student endorsement of teleological reasoning on understanding and acceptance of natural selection: an exploratory study

Teleological Functional Explanations: A New Naturalist Synthesis

Teleology beyond explanation

Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin

Are we Teleologically Essentialist?

Teleological generics

The practical other: teleology and its development

A complex systems theory of teleology

EVOLUTION, TELEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY

Teleology and function in non-living nature