Abstract:Background: Good Clinical Practice is an international standard for the design and conduct of clinical trials to ensure ethical and scientific integrity. Recent National Institutes of Health policy mandates Good Clinical Practice training for all investigators and staff involved in National Institutes of Health–funded clinical trials, yet approaches to Good Clinical Practice training vary widely. There are limited data on Good Clinical Practice knowledge among the clinical trial workforce and no evidence regarding effective methods to learn Good Clinical Practice. Methods: We used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. We conducted 18 exploratory qualitative interviews with clinical research coordinators to help inform the development of the quantitative survey. We then administered a validated 32-item, multiple-choice test of Good Clinical Practice knowledge with a survey of work and training experiences to 625 clinical research coordinators at three academic medical centers in the United States. Variables that were significantly associated with Good Clinical Practice knowledge were entered into a multiple regression analysis to identify unique predictors of Good Clinical Practice knowledge. We controlled for verbal–numerical reasoning and learning orientation. Results: During qualitative interviews, clinical research coordinators reported that formal Good Clinical Practice training had value but they simultaneously emphasized the importance of experience, day-to-day practice, and observing colleagues and mentors as essential to supplement formal training. In our quantitative survey, five variables predicted a total of 22% of variance in Good Clinical Practice knowledge scores: years of experience as a clinical research coordinator, working on diverse types of trials, supporting industry-funded trials, being certified in clinical research coordination, and aggregated hours of online and face-to-face training (in that order). Conclusion: The duration and richness of experience as a clinical research coordinator were the strongest predictors of Good Clinical Practice knowledge, a finding consistent with our exploratory qualitative interview results. Our findings suggest that formal online and face-to-face training has a minimal influence on Good Clinical Practice knowledge. The type of training—whether online or face to face—does not make a significant difference in Good Clinical Practice knowledge scores. Much of the variance in Good Clinical Practice knowledge remains unexplained, calling for further research in this area.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on how clinical research coordinators acquire good knowledge of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Specifically, the paper aims to: 1. **Explore the views and experiences of clinical research coordinators regarding learning GCP**: Use qualitative methods to understand the experiences and views of clinical research coordinators in the process of learning GCP, especially which methods they think are the most effective and how they supplement formal training in actual work. 2. **Identify factors affecting GCP knowledge**: Use testing and quantitative survey methods, combined with the results of qualitative research, to determine which factors can predict the GCP knowledge level of clinical research coordinators. These factors include work experience, face - to - face and online training, certification status, and other characteristics related to clinical research coordinators. ### Research background and purpose - **The importance of GCP**: GCP is an international standard used to ensure that the design, implementation, and reporting of clinical trials meet ethical and scientific integrity. It aims to protect the rights and safety of subjects, ensure the rigor of trials, meet regulatory requirements, and safeguard data integrity. - **Training needs**: In recent years, the policy of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) requires that all researchers and staff involved in NIH - funded clinical trials must receive GCP training. However, currently, there is limited data on the GCP knowledge level of clinical trial staff, and there is a lack of evidence on the most effective methods for learning GCP. ### Research methods - **Qualitative research**: Through 18 semi - structured telephone interviews, collect the experiences and views of clinical research coordinators regarding learning GCP. - **Quantitative research**: Through cross - sectional surveys and newly developed GCP knowledge tests, collect data from 625 clinical research coordinators in three research - intensive medical centers. ### Main findings - **Results of qualitative research**: Most clinical research coordinators believe that although formal training is valuable, experience, daily practice, observing colleagues and mentors are important supplements for learning GCP. - **Results of quantitative research**: - Years of work are the strongest predictors of GCP knowledge. - Other significant predictors include: coordinating multiple types of trials, supporting industry - funded trials, holding formal certifications, and total training time. - The type of training (online or face - to - face) has no significant impact on GCP knowledge. ### Conclusions - **The importance of experience**: The years of work and rich work experience of clinical research coordinators are the main predictors of GCP knowledge. - **The impact of training**: Although training is related to GCP knowledge, its impact is small, and there is no significant difference in the type of training (online or face - to - face). - **Future research directions**: Further research is needed to explain other factors of variation in GCP knowledge. Through these studies, the paper provides important information for evaluating the effectiveness of current GCP training methods and points out the direction for future improvement.

How do clinical research coordinators learn Good Clinical Practice? A mixed-methods study of factors that predict uptake of knowledge

Present Status and Perspectives on Future Roles of Japanese Clinical Research Coordinators

Barriers and Strategies for Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Perspectives from Neurological Clinical Research Coordinators

What PIs want when hiring a clinical research coordinator

Academic medical center clinical research professional workforce: Part 2 - Issues in staff onboarding and professional development

159 Good Clinical Practice training assignment and tracking completions improvement project

Teaching Clinical Research: What Clinicians Need to Know.

Abstract B175: Addressing the urgent demand for clinical research professionals through a novel training initiative

A global pilot comparative, cross-sectional study of clinical research nurses/research midwives: Definition, knowledge base, and communication skills related to the conduct of decentralized clinical trials

European survey on national training activities in clinical research

Challenges and solutions to recruiting diverse populations to oncology clinical trials: A mixed-methods study of clinical research coordinators.

A survey of practicum training practices in clinical neuropsychology

Investigator knowledge, awareness, and registrations of academic clinical trials with the Clinical Trial Registry of India: An observational study

Emphasizing Patient-Centricity Through a Tailored Training Program to Empower Patients, Advocates, and Ethics Committees in Good Clinical Practice

Perceived opportunities of clinical reasoning learning in postgraduate psychiatry training: Trainees' and faculty's perspectives

Perspectives on Academic Training in Clinical Oncology in the United Kingdom: A National Cross-Sectional Analysis

COLONTOWN Searching Safari: Education to remove barriers to pursue clinical trials for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Clinicians' attitudes towards clinical trials of cancer therapy

Role of clinical research coordinators in promoting clinical trials of drugs for surgical patients

Abstract 999: Clinical trial matchmaking: Connecting sites to sponsors

Clinical research nursing and factors influencing success: a qualitative study describing the interplay between individual and organisational leadership influences and their impact on the delivery of clinical research in healthcare