Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks

Roslyn Dakin,T. Brandt Ryder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913284117
IF: 11.1
2020-01-24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance In animal societies, social partnerships form a dynamic network that can change over time. Why are some social network structures more stable than others? We addressed this question by studying a cooperative bird species in which social behavior is important for fitness, similar to humans. We found that stable social networks are characterized by more frequent interactions but sparser connectivity throughout the network. Using a simulation, we show how both results can be explained by a simple model of reciprocity. These findings indicate that social stability is governed by a trade-off whereby individuals can either maintain a few high-quality partners or increase partner number. This fundamental trade-off may govern the dynamics and stability of many societies, including in humans.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?