Blinded, Double‐Dummy, Parallel‐Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5‐Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance

Marianne J. Chapman,Karen L. Jones,Cristina Almansa,Chris N. Barnes,Deanna Nguyen,Adam M. Deane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1732
2020-01-28
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Abstract:<article><section class="article-section article-section__abstract"><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Delayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critical illness. This phase 2a study compared TAK‐954, a selective agonist of 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors, with metoclopramide in critically ill patients with EFI (NCT01953081).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>A blinded, double‐dummy trial was conducted in mechanically ventilated patients with EFI (&gt;200 mL gastric residual volume within 24 hours before randomization). Patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 over 1 hour then 0.9% saline injection 4 times/d (sham metoclopramide) or the active comparator 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide 4 times/d and a 1‐hour 0.9% saline infusion. After initial dosing, participants received a radiolabeled meal of liquid nutrient (Ensure; 106 kcal), and gastric emptying was measured (scintigraphy). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time of consent through to day 5; serious AEs were collected to day 30.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Thirteen patients (TAK‐954, n = 7; metoclopramide, n = 6) participated. Five patients in the TAK‐954 group and 4 in the metoclopramide group experienced AEs (2 and 3, respectively, were serious). All AEs except 1 (diarrhea in the metoclopramide group) were considered unrelated to study drug. Following treatment, a greater proportion of patients receiving TAK‐954 had normal gastric retention (&lt;13% retention at 180 minutes) than those receiving metoclopramide (6/7 vs 3/6 patients, respectively).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>A single dose of 0.5 mg intravenous TAK‐954 appears to have at least similar efficacy in accelerating gastric emptying to multiple doses of 10 mg metoclopramide and was not associated with increased AEs.</p></section></section><section class="article-section article-section__full"><section class="article-section__content"><h2 class="article-section__title section__title section1"> Introduction</h2><p>Gastrointestinal motility is frequently decreased in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0001">1</a>, <a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0002">2</a></span> Delayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI), which occurs in up to 30% of critically ill patients, compromises nutrition status, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0003">3</a>, <a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0004">4</a></span> EFI is usually defined by a large gastric residual volume (GRV). The treatment of EFI usually involves administration of a prokinetic drug, the most frequently prescribed agent being metoclopramide.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0004">4</a>-<a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0007">7</a></span> However, metoclopramide has an adverse event (AE) profile such that there is a need for alternative agents.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0001">1</a>, <a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0008">8</a></span></p><p>The nonselective serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine) type 4 (5‐HT<sub>4</sub>) receptor agonist cisapride was previously used as an effective gastrointestinal prokinetic drug to accelerate gastric emptying and reduce EFI in critically ill patients.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0009">9</a>-<a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0012">12</a></span> However, cisapride was withdrawn from the market because of the potential for serious cardiovascular events.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0001">1</a></span> In contrast to nonselective agonists, highly selective 5‐HT<sub>4</sub> receptor agonists, such as TAK‐954 (previously TD‐8954), appear to have an improved safety profile with respect to the risk of cardiac arrhythmias.<span><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0013">13</a>, <a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#jpen1732-bib-0014">14</a></span> However, none of these agents have been tested in critically ill individuals. </p><p>The major objectives of this phase 2a study in critically ill patients with EFI included an evaluation of the safety and tolerability of a single dose of TAK‐954, gastric emptying after a single dose of TAK‐954 when compared with multiple doses of metoclopramide, and the pharmacokinetics of TAK‐954. An additional objective included assessment of <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?