Abstract:The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; Christensen et?al 2007) has, with greater confidence than previous reports, warned the international community that the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gases emissions will result in global climate change. One of the most direct and threatening impacts it may have on human societies is the potential consequences on global crop production. Indeed agriculture is considered as the most weather-dependent of all human activities (Hansen 2002) since climate is a primary determinant for agricultural productivity. The potential impact of climate change on crop productivity is an additional strain on the global food system which is already facing the difficult challenge of increasing food production to feed a projected 9 billion people by 2050 with changing consumption patterns and growing scarcity of water and land (Beddington 2010). In some regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa or South Asia that are already food insecure and where most of the population increase and economic development will take place, climate change could be the additional stress that pushes systems over the edge. A striking example, if needed, is the work from Collomb (1999) which estimates that by 2050 food needs will more than quintuple in Africa and more than double in Asia. Better knowledge of climate change impacts on crop productivity in those vulnerable regions is crucial to inform policies and to support adaptation strategies that may counteract the adverse effects. Although there is a growing literature on the impact of climate change on crop productivity in tropical regions, it is difficult to provide a consistent assessment of future yield changes because of large uncertainties in regional climate change projections, in the response of crops to environmental change (rainfall, temperature, CO2 concentration), in the coupling between climate models and crop productivity functions, and in the adaptation of agricultural systems to progressive climate change (Roudier et?al 2011, Challinor et?al 2007). These uncertainties result in a large spread of crop yield projections indicating a low confidence in future yield projections. A recent study by Knox et?al (2012) is among the first to provide robust evidence of how climate change will impact productivity of major crops in Africa and South Asia. Using a meta-analysis, which is widely used in epidemiology and medicine and consists in comparing and combining results from different independent published studies, Knox et?al (2012) show a consistent yield loss by the 2050s of major crops (wheat, maize, sorghum and millet) in both regions. This systematic review and meta-analysis of data in 52 original publications from an initial screen of 1144 studies nicely extend previous works by M?ller et?al (2011) and Roudier et?al (2011), confirming the threat of negative climate change impacts in Africa but also in South Asia. Knox et?al (2012) estimate that mean yield change for all crops is -8% by the 2050s with strong variations among crops and regions. For instance evidence of yield reduction up to -40% are detected for some regions of Africa while no mean yield change is detected for rice in India. Variations in crop yield projections decrease when considering a large number of climate models confirming the relevance of the expanded use of multi-model ensembles of projections of future climate change adopted in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Conversely, variations in crop yield projections increase with the crop model complexity especially when using process-based crop models over statistical models. Such differences in crop yield variations may be attributed either to the structural differences between crop model approaches or to the spatial scale differences; biophysical crop models operating at finer spatial scales and thus reproducing the higher variability of impacts at these scales. Such robust evidence of future yield change in Africa and South Asia can be surprising in regards to the diverging projections in a warmer climate of summer monsoon rainfall, the primary driver for rainfed crop productivity in the region, especially in West Africa where some studies make projections of wetter conditions and some predict more frequent droughts (Druyan 2011). This is because of the adverse role of higher temperatures in shortening the crop cycle duration and increasing evapotranspiration demand and thus reducing crop yields, irrespective of rainfall changes (Berg et?al 2012, Roudier et?al 2011, Schlenker and Lobell 2010). Potential wetter conditions or elevated CO2 concentrations hardly counteract the adverse effect of higher temperatures. Although such systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted by Knox et?al (2012), M?ller et?al (2011) or Roudier et?al (2011) can provide important insights about sign, magnitude and uncertainty of climate change impacts, direct comparison among studies suffers from inevitable limitations. In particular the diversity of the studies selected for the meta-analysis, encompassing a range of different countries, scales, crops and methods (climate models and scenarios, crop models, downscaling technique), makes it difficult to aggregate crop yield projections to provide a consistent and precise impact assessment. A rigorous multi-ensembles approach, with varying climate models, emissions scenarios, crop models, and downscaling techniques, as recommended by Challinor et?al (2007), would enable a move towards a more complete sampling of uncertainty in crop yield projections. In that sense, coordinated modeling experiments such as the ones conducted throughout the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP; www.agmip.org/) are likely to improve substantially the characterization of the threat of crop yield losses and food insecurity due to climate change. In spite of the threat of crop yield losses in a warmer climate, it is important to keep in mind, as discussed by Berg et?al (2012), that developing countries in the tropics have the potential to more than offset such adverse impacts by implementing more intensive agricultural practices and adapting agriculture to climate and environmental change. Indeed Africa and in a lesser extend South Asia are among the only regions of the world where there is an untapped potential for raising agricultural productivity since poor soil fertility and low input levels, combined with extensive agricultural practices, contribute to a large gap between actual and potential yields (Licker et?al 2010). References Beddington J 2010 Food security: contributions from science to a new and greener revolution Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365 61?71 Berg A, de Noblet-Ducoudr? N, Sultan B, Lengaigne N and Guimberteau M 2012 Projections of climate change impacts on potential crop productivity over tropical regions Agric. For. Meteorol. at press (doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.12.003) Challinor A, Wheeler T, Garforth C, Craufurd P and Kassam A 2007 Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change Clim. Change 83 381?99 Christensen J H et al 2007 Regional climate projections Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ed S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, K B Averyt, M Tignor and H L Miller (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Collomb P 1999 A narrow road to food security from now to 2050 FAO Economica (Paris: FAO) Druyan L M 2011 Studies of 21st-century precipitation trends over West Africa Int. J. Climatol. 31 1415?572 Hansen J W 2002 Realizing the potential benefits of climate prediction to agriculture: issues, approaches, challenges Agric. Syst. 74 309?30 Knox J, Hess T, Daccache A and Wheeler T 2012 Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia Environ. Res. Lett. 7 034032 Licker R, Johnston M, Foley J A, Barford C, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C and Ramankutty N 2010 Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the 'yield gap' of croplands around the world? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19 769?82 M?ller C, Cramer W, Hare W L and Lotze-Campen H 2011 Climate change risks for African agriculture Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 4313?5 Roudier P, Sultan S, Quirion P and Berg A 2011 The impact of future climate change on West African crop yields: what does the recent literature say? Glob. Environ. Change 21 1073?83 Schlenker W and Lobell D 2010 Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture Environ. Res. Lett. 5 014010

Abstract:Calls to boost agricultural production in order to meet the demands of a growing global population are now commonplace. Yet, depending on where productivity changes and population growth occur, international trade could be increasingly necessary in the transfer of food from farms to consumers. Fader et al (2013) offer a nuanced view of this spatial disconnect and its food security implications by considering a valuable thought experiment: what countries could foreseeably meet their food requirements from internal production alone circa 2000 and for contrasting scenarios in 2050? They investigate the extent to which available renewable water and land resources constrain domestic per capita crop production, assuming current as well as broadly improved yields. The findings convey an intuitive, though often overlooked, point that population growth is likely to increase the reliance of certain regions on food imports unless substantial productivity improvements are realized. It is unlikely that any nation would be compelled to produce all of its food domestically, but reflecting on potential food self-sufficiency is a worthwhile endeavor. Importing crops may be matter of choice, but also one of necessity if available land, water, and yields limit production. Dependence on food imports can involve uncertainty: production shortfalls arising from drought and other factors have been associated with price volatility—or even restrictions on crop exports—posing challenges to countries anticipating consistent import arrangements (Headey 2011). Compounding this uncertainty is that a relatively small number of countries produce the bulk of staple crops for global markets. Just eight countries comprising 11% of the global population produced, on average, 70% of cereal exports during the past decade (FAO 2013). Although trade networks are dynamic, some net-importing countries have developed entrenched relationships with particular producers that entail very large crop transfers (Carr et al 2012). A central finding of Fader et al 's study is that domestic crop production could theoretically replace imports and allow food self-sufficiency in many countries. Embracing this potential could lessen the need to increase imports as populations grow. Yet, in their extreme scenario—assuming no yield improvements, no agricultural expansion and high population growth rates—roughly 51% of the global population would be import dependent by 2050. While improbable, this case raises the question of how such a spike in crop demands might ricochet across producing countries. Exporters could alter their production and export rates in response to various internal or external drivers, such as land-use policies, concerns over grain stocks, or climate change impacts (Hertel et al 2010, Lambin and Meyfroidt 2011, Headey 2011). Suweis et al (2013) suggest that water-rich nations are unlikely to maintain their current crop export rates amidst global change, questioning the persistence of global food trade relationships in the absence of mitigative actions. The uneven role of a relatively small number of nations to the food security of many is apparent when considering the origins of key crops imported by countries that Fader et al estimate have already crossed a resource boundary limiting food self-sufficiency (figure 1). Figure 1. The origins of key crops (maize, milled/paddy rice, soybean, and wheat) imported by 49 countries that have exceeded a land or water constraint boundary currently limiting food self-sufficiency. The map of countries exceeding at least one boundary circa 2000, shaded in black, is based on figure 1(B) in Fader et al (2013). The size of the lines indicate the relative quantity of kilocalories imported, calculated using FAO (2013) import matrices and crop kilocalorie contents (FAO 2001) averaged for the period 2000–2010. Internal trade among countries that had exceeded a land or water boundary totaled ~6%. Small island nations and 11 countries not reporting import origin data were omitted here. Fader et al 's potential crop production estimates are derived from a comprehensive global model, but several factors could compound import dependence or shift yield trajectories. Growing meat consumption that typically coincides with rising average incomes will drive increased demand for crops across some regions surpassing that of population growth (Delgado 2003, Kastner et al 2012). Such trends would exacerbate direct or indirect reliance on foreign land and water resources. Comparison of global crop productivity simulations with regional crop response models would help to better understand how management interventions (Lobell et al 2009) and changing climate (Thornton et al 2009) positively or negatively impact attainable per capita production across regions. Moreover, the cropland expansion scenarios used in Fader et al 's study are optimistic in that they draw on a sizable land base of 13.2 million km2, which, if fully utilized, would be an almost doubling of the 15.1 million km2 under production in 2000 (FAO 2013). We already use much of the world's prime arable lands, with stagnating yield trends for key crops in some locations, so realizing equivalent yields from a vast new area is unlikely (Foley et al 2011, Ray et al 2012). Considering how specific farm management and demand-driven feedbacks alter trade patterns would provide valuable juxtaposition to Fader et al 's benchmark study. Ultimately, equity and cooperation among countries may be increasingly critical to regional food security if locations of food production and consumption continue to diverge. Even with large increases in yields and widespread cropland expansion, Fader et al (2013) project that up to 30 countries—largely low-income economies—will remain import dependent due to resource constraints. Food security in poorer countries most vulnerable to productivity shocks and price volatility depends on the ability of certain populations to afford imports (Naylor and Falcon 2010). Future changes in agricultural commodity prices tied to yield variations could disproportionately impact the welfare of specific households, while possibly benefiting other lower income countries that produce exports (Hertel et al 2010). In the event that import dependence rises markedly from 16% of the global population circa 2000 (Fader et al 2013), cooperative trade policies may be pivotal to alleviating food insecurity of the most vulnerable net-food importing countries (Bouët and Debucquet 2012). Quantifying the capacity of countries to meet their per capita crop requirements underpins the importance of truly widespread yield improvements, particularly given the already concentrated nature of export production. Fader et al 's study offers new insight on how the growing spatial disconnect between where people live and where food is grown may dictate either increasingly entrenched dependence on foreign production or immense cropland expansion throughout net-importing countries. Framing this challenge in terms of potential domestic crop production reveals that even small yield improvements could go a long way toward easing both. Acknowledgments I thank K Carlson, J Foley, P West, M Schipanski, and N Mueller for comments. References Bouët A and Debucquet D 2012 Food crisis and export taxation: the cost of non-cooperative trade policies Rev. World Econom. 148 209–33 Carr J A, D'Odorico P, Laio F and Ridolfi L 2012 On the temporal variability of the virtual water network Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 L06404 Delgado C L 2003 Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution J. Nutr. 133 3907S–10S Fader M, Gerten D, Krause M, Lucht W and Cramer W 2013 Spatial decoupling of agricultural production and consumption: quantifying dependence of countries on food imports due to domestic land and water constraints Environ. Res. Lett. 8 014046 FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2001 Food Balance Sheets: A Handbook (Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2013 FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Databases (Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) Foley J A et al 2011 Solutions for a cultivated planet Nature 478 337–42 Headey D 2011 Rethinking the global food crisis: the role of trade shocks Food Policy 36 136–46 Hertel T W, Burke M B and Lobell D B 2010 The poverty implications of climate-induced crop yield changes by 2030 Glob. Environ. Change 20 577–85 Kastner T, Rivas M J I, Koch W and Nonhebel S 2012 Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109 6868–72 Lambin E F and Meyfroidt P 2011 Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108 3465–72 Lobell D B, Cassman K G and Field C B 2009 Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34 179 Naylor R L and Falcon W P 2010 Food security in an era of economic volatility Popul. Dev. Rev. 36 693–723 Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Mueller N D, West P C and Foley J A 2012 Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation Nature Commun. 3 1293 Suweis S, Rinaldo A, Maritan A and D'Odorico P 2013 Water-controlled wealth of nations Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110 4230–3 Thornton P K, Jones P G, Alagarswamy G and Andresen J 2009 Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa Glob. Environ. Change 19 54–65

Agricultural lands key to mitigation and adaptation

Assessment of agricultural emissions, climate change mitigation and adaptation practices in Ethiopia

Towards Resilient, Inclusive, Sustainable Livestock Farming Systems

Afforestation falls short as a biodiversity strategy

Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators

Climate change impacts and adaptation for dryland farming systems in Zimbabwe: a stakeholder-driven integrated multi-model assessment

Microsoft Word-nwaa145.docx

How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?

Global warming threatens agricultural productivity in Africa and South Asia

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting agricultural management for climate change in developing countries: providing the basis for action

Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change Adaptation for Small-Scale Land Users in Sub-Saharan Africa

Greenhouse gas mitigation on croplands: clarifying the debate on knowns, unknowns and risks to move forward with effective management interventions

National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics

Improved data for integrated modeling of global environmental change

Carbon, cash, cattle and the climate crisis

Eating on an interconnected planet

Responding to climate change and the global land crisis: REDD+, market transformation and low-emissions rural development

Analysis of existing models of climate change and identification of zones which are suitable for agricultural production in the context of rural territories

How can the agricultural soil support in the climate change mitigation and adaptation?

Climate change adaptation by smallholder farmers in Southern Africa: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review.

How to make land use policy decisions: Integrating science and economics to deliver connected climate, biodiversity, and food objectives.