Quantum-chemical calculations on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) single-layer nanostructures: polymeric slab vs. quantum dot

Mohammad Ghashghaee,Zahra Azizi,Mehdi Ghambarian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01496-x
2020-01-28
Structural Chemistry
Abstract:Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) has been the focus of enormous attention in recent years for its fantastic in-plane and surface properties. Several periodic and cluster models of g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> including a quantum dot have been investigated using density functional theory (DFT) at the HSE06/Def2-TZVP level. The quantum dot with side triazine rings in nearly perpendicular alignment to the central ring was (by 98.40 kcal/mol) more stable than any other cluster, including its planar analogue—a metastable phase of carbon nitride. The g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> quantum dot showed the largest deviation (3.27 eV, 7.9%) from the bandgap of the polymeric material. On the other hand, the unrelaxed symmetrical cluster had the smallest deviation (+ 0.03 eV, 1.0%) from the reference bandgap (and also in terms of global hardness), indicating that it could be taken as a replacement cluster for modeling of a polymeric surface in such explorations. The plots of the density of states (DOS) revealed the inherent instabilities of the planar models compared to the quantum dot. Furthermore, the g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> quantum dot showed the highest chemical hardness among the models investigated. The electronic band structures of the g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> quantum dot implied its relatively better photoabsorption ability referenced to the polymeric surface. However, the structural changes had significant effects on the orbital and charge distributions in the C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> models.
chemistry, multidisciplinary, physical,crystallography
What problem does this paper attempt to address?