Safety and effectiveness of ataluren: comparison of results from the STRIDE Registry and CINRG DMD Natural History Study

Eugenio Mercuri,Francesco Muntoni,Andrés Nascimento Osorio,Már Tulinius,Filippo Buccella,Lauren P Morgenroth,Heather Gordish-Dressman,Joel Jiang,Panayiota Trifillis,Jin Zhu,Allan Kristensen,Claudio L Santos,Erik K Henricson,Craig M McDonald,Isabelle Desguerre,,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0171
2020-04-01
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Abstract:Aim: Strategic Targeting of Registries and International Database of Excellence (STRIDE) is an ongoing, multicenter registry providing real-world evidence regarding ataluren use in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). We examined the effectiveness of ataluren + standard of care (SoC) in the registry versus SoC alone in the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group (CINRG) Duchenne Natural History Study (DNHS), DMD genotype–phenotype/–ataluren benefit correlations and ataluren safety. Patients & methods: Propensity score matching was performed to identify STRIDE and CINRG DNHS patients who were comparable in established disease progression predictors (registry cut-off date, 9 July 2018). Results & conclusion: Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated that ataluren + SoC significantly delayed age at loss of ambulation and age at worsening performance in timed function tests versus SoC alone (p ≤ 0.05). There were no DMD genotype–phenotype/ataluren benefit correlations. Ataluren was well tolerated. These results indicate that ataluren + SoC delays functional milestones of DMD progression in patients with nmDMD in routine clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02369731. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02369731.
health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?