Utilization of GC–MS untargeted metabolomics to assess the delayed response of glufosinate treatment of transgenic herbicide resistant (HR) buffalo grasses (Stenotaphrum secundatum L.)

Siriwat Boonchaisri,Trevor Stevenson,Daniel A. Dias
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-1644-9
2020-01-27
Metabolomics
Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Introduction</h3><p class="Para">Herbicide resistant (HR) buffalo grasses were genetically engineered to resist the <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">non</em>-selective herbicide, glufosinate in order to facilitate a modern, '<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">weeding program</em>' which is highly effective in terms of minimizing costs and labor. The resistant trait was conferred by an insertion of the <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">pat</em> gene to allow for the production of the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) to detoxify the glufosinate inhibitive effect. To date, there are only a few reports using metabolomics as well as molecular characterizations published for glufosinate-resistant crops with no reports on HR turfgrass. Therefore, for the first time, this study examines the metabolome of glufosinate-resistant buffalo grasses which not only will be useful to future growers but also the scientific community.</p><h3 class="Heading">Objective</h3><p class="Para">A major aim of this present work is to characterize and evaluate the metabolic alterations which may arise from a genetic transformation of HR buffalo grasses by comprehensively using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) based untargeted metabolomics.</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">Eight-week old plants of 4 HR buffalo grasses, (93-1A, 93-2B, 93-3C and 93-5A) and 3 wild type varieties (WT 8-4A, WT 9-1B and WT 9-1B) were selected for physiological, molecular and metabolomics experiments. Plants were either sprayed with 1, 5, 10 and 15% <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">v/v</em> of glufosinate to evaluate the visual injuries or submerged in 5% <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">v/v</em> of glufosinate 3 days prior to a GC–MS based untargeted metabolomics analysis. In contrast, the control group was treated with distilled water. Leaves were extracted in 1:1 methanol:water and then analysed, using an <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">in-house</em> GC–MS untargeted workflow.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">Results identified 199 metabolites with only 6 of them (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">cis</em>-aconitic acid, allantoin, cellobiose, glyceric acid, maltose and octadecanoic acid) found to be statistically significant (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> &lt; 0.05) between the HR and wild type buffalo grass varieties compared to the control experiment. Among these metabolites, unusual accumulation of allantoin was prominent and was an unanticipated effect of the <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">pat</em> gene insertion. As expected, glufosinate treatment caused significant metabolic alterations in the sensitive wild type, with the up-regulation of several amino acids (e.g. phenylalanine and isoleucine) which was likely due to glufosinate-induced senescence. The aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthetic pathway was identified as the most significant enriched pathway as a result of glufosinate effects because a number of its intermediates were amino acids.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusion</h3><p class="Para">HR buffalo grasses were very similar to its wild type comparator based on a comprehensive GC–MS based untargeted metabolomics and therefore, should guarantee the safe use of these HR buffalo grasses. The current metabolomics analyses not only confirmed the effects of glufosinate to up-regulate free amino acid pools in the sensitive wild type but also several alterations in sugar, sugar phosphate and organic acid metabolism have been reported.</p>
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?