Abstract:Recently, studies on rhetorical structure of research articles (RAs) have attracted a great attention of researchers. Among the sections of RA, the Introduction section has been investigated extensively while much fewer studies have been done on the Methods section. Besides, the majority of the existing studies focus only on a single discipline or on a comparison between two disciplines. Very little, however, has been conducted to compare the rhetorical structure between two sub-disciplines from one academic field. In this study, therefore, the Methods sections from Management and Marketing, two sub-disciplines of business, were analyzed and compared to identify the rhetorical variations due to disciplinary concepts and practices between these two sub-disciplines. Two sets of corpus were compiled, each with ten Methods sections from two prestigious journals in the fields of Management and Marketing, respectively. Lim’s model (2006) for the rhetorical structure of the Methods section in Management was adopted as the analytical framework. Results of the analysis showed that the chosen analytical framework could not offer sufficient explanations for the rhetorical structure of the Methods sections in the two sub-disciplines of business, even revealing some discrepancies between the framework and the actual texts. Only 30% of the Methods sections in the Management corpus appeared to fit the selected model while in the Marketing corpus, the Methods sections had a greater diversity of rhetorical patterns due to the requirements for publishing in the two selected Marketing journals. The findings in this study may have some implications for writing the Methods sections in the business discipline, such as the need for explicit instruction of writing conventions of this particular section and the guidance to realize the rhetorical differences between these two sub-disciplines for more effective sub-discipline specific writing. Keywords: The Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary Variations

Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies

Advancing Research Methodologies in Management: Revisiting Debates, Setting New Grounds for Pluralism

Application of Mixed Methods in Health Services Management Research: A Systematic Review

Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?

Rigour vs. Reality: Contextualizing Qualitative Research in the Low‐Income Settings in Emerging Markets

The Essence of Management and Evaluation of Management Research

Assessing mixed methods research quality in the European student mobility literature

The Validity Issue in Mixed Research

Are rigor and transparency enough? Review and future directions for case studies in technology and innovation Management

Complexity Theory Research: the Necessity to Develop Multi-Methodological Approaches for Study on Management

A Framework for Rigorous Qualitative Research as a Component of Mixed Method Rapid-Cycle Evaluation

THE METHODS SECTIONS IN MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING RESEARCH ARTICLES: RHETORICAL VARIATIONS BETWEEN TWO SUB-DISCIPLINES OF BUSINESS

Relevance and Rigor in International Business Teaching: Using the CSA-FSA Matrix

Academic Spirit and Ethics in Management Research: The History and Reality in China

Rigor and Relevance in Asian Management Research: Where Are We and Where Can We Go?

Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research

Operationalizing and Conceptualizing Quality in Mixed Methods Research: A Multiple Case Study of the Disciplines of Education, Nursing, Psychology, and Sociology

Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute

The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review.

Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research

Research Methodology in Management Science: Triangulation