Solid Waste Management in the Context of the Waste Hierarchy and Circular Economy Frameworks: An International Critical Review
Florence Barbara Awino,Sabine E. Apitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4774
2023-04-13
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Abstract:Growing populations and consumption drive solid waste management (SWM) challenges; globalization of transport, food production, and trade, including waste trading, distributes risks, worldwide. Using Waste Hierarchy (3Rs) and Circular Economy (CE) concepts, we updated a Conceptual Waste Framework used by international organizations to evaluate SWM practices. We identified the key steps, and the important factors, as well as stakeholders, which are essential features for effective SWM. Within this updated conceptual framework, we qualitatively evaluated Global SWM strategies and practices, identifying opportunities, barriers, and best practices. We find that, although a few exceptional countries exhibit zero waste compliance, most, fare poorly, as exhibited by the high waste generation, incineration, and disposal (open dumping, landfilling) volumes. In the Global North, SWM strategies and practices rely heavily on technologies, economic tools, regulatory frameworks, education, and social engagement to raise stakeholder awareness, and enhance inclusion, and participation, while in the Global South, many governments take sole legal responsibility for SWM, seeking to eliminate waste, as a public "nuisance". Separation and recycling in the Global South are mainly implemented by "informal" economies, in which subsistence needs, drive recyclable materials retrieval. Imported, regionally inappropriate tools, economic constraints, weak policies and governance, waste trading, non‐inclusive stakeholder participation, data limitations, and limited public awareness continue to pose major waste and environmental management challenges across nations. Within the context of the framework, we conclude that best practices from around the world can be used to guide decision‐making, globally. Despite variations in drivers and needs across regions, nations in both the Global North and South need to improve WH and CE compliance, and enhance stakeholders' partnership, awareness, and participation throughout the SWM process. Partnerships between the Global North and South could better manage traded wastes, reduce adverse impacts, and enhance global environmental sustainability and equity, supporting UN Sustainable Development Goals.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;00:0–0. © 2023 SETAC
environmental sciences,toxicology