Abstract:Background: The Internet is an invaluable tool for researchers and certainly also a source of inspiration. However, never before has it been so easy to plagiarise the work of others by clipping together (copy & paste) an apparently original paper or review paper from paragraphs on several websites. Moreover, the threshold of stealing ideas, whether lifting paragraphs or perhaps even whole articles from the Internet, seems to be much lower than copying sections from books or articles. In this article, we shall use the term cyberplagarism to describe the case where someone, intentionally or inadvertently, is taking information, phrases, or thoughts from the World Wide Web (WWW) and using it in a scholarly article without attributing the origin. Objectives: To illustrate a case of cyberplagiarism and to discuss potential Methods using the Internet to detect scientific misconduct. This report was also written to stimulate debate and thought among journal editors about the use of state of the art technology to fight cyberplagiarism. Methods: A case of a recent incident of cyberplagiarism, which occurred in the Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (JRCSEd), is reported. A systematic search of the Internet for informatics tools that help to identify plagiarism and duplicate publication was conducted. Results: This is the first in-depth report of an incident where significant portions of a web article were lifted into a scholarly article without attribution. In detecting and demonstrating this incident, a tool at www.plagiarism.org, has proven to be particularly useful. The plagiarism report generated by this tool stated that more than one third (36%) of the JRCSEd article consisted of phrases that were directly copied from multiple websites, without giving attribution to this fact. Conclusions: Cyberplagiarism may be a widespread and increasing problem. Plagiarism could be easily detected by journal editors and peer-reviewers if informatics tools would be applied. There is a striking gap between what is technically possible and what is in widespread use. As a consequence of the case described in this report, JMIR has taken the lead in applying information technology to prevent and fight plagiarism by routinely checking new submissions for evidence of cyberplagiarism.

Self-plagiarism in academic journal articles: from the perspectives of international editors-in-chief in editorial and COPE case

The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing

Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: incidence, characteristics and optimization of screening—case study in a major specialty medical journal

Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer

Editorial reflections about two cases of academic misconduct

How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article

Types of plagiarism and how to avoid misconduct: Pros and cons of plagiarism detection tools in research writing and publication

Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education

[Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity]

Plagiarism in Non-Anglophone Countries: a Cross-sectional Survey of Researchers and Journal Editors

Ins and Outs of Plagiarism in Academia: Reconnoitring Concepts, Causes, and Consequences

Journals need to provide better guidance for victims of plagiarism

Plagiarism in articles published in journals indexed in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL): a comparative analysis between 2013 and 2018

Report of a case of cyberplagiarism--and reflections on detecting and preventing academic misconduct using the Internet

How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?

Self-Plagiarism in AAAS Science Article about Pubpeer’s President, Brandon Stell

Academic Integrity in Higher Education: Understanding and Addressing Plagiarism

A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles

The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region

On the Perception of Plagiarism in Academia: Context and Intent

Ambiguity in Ethical Standards: Global Versus Local Science in Explaining Academic Plagiarism