Outcome of patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score

Mirjam R. Heldner,Panagiotis Chaloulos-Iakovidis,Leonidas Panos,Bastian Volbers,Johannes Kaesmacher,Tomas Dobrocky,Pasquale Mordasini,Marwan El-Koussy,Jan Gralla,Marcel Arnold,Urs Fischer,Heinrich P. Mattle,Simon Jung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09744-0
2020-02-15
Journal of Neurology
Abstract:<span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Background</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">Optimal management of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and low NIHSS score is unknown, which was the aim to investigate in this study.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Methods</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective single tertiary care centre 14-year cohort of patients with LVO in the anterior circulation and NIHSS score ≤ 5 on admission. Outcome was analysed according to primary intended therapy.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec3"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Results</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">Among 185 patients (median age 67.4 years), 52.4% received primary conservative therapy (including 26.8% secondary reperfusion in case of secondary neurological deterioration), 12.4% IV thrombolysis (IVT) only and 35.1% primary endovascular therapy (EVT). 95 (51.4%) patients experienced neurological deterioration until 3 months. Primary-IVT-only and primary-EVT compared to conservative-therapy patients had better 3 months' outcome (54.5% vs. 30.8%: <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 6.02; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.004 for mRS 0–1 and 54.7% vs. 30.8%: <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 5.09; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.002, respectively). Also mRS shift analysis favored primary-IVT-only and primary-EVT patients (<sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 6.25; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.001 and <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 3.14; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.003). Outcome in primary-IVT-only vs. primary-EVT patients did not differ significantly. Patients who received secondary EVT because of neurological deterioration after primary-conservative-therapy had worse 3 months' outcome than primary-EVT patients (20.8% vs. 30.8%: <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 0.24; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.047 for mRS 0–1 and <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub>OR 0.31; <sub class="a-plus-plus">adjusted</sub><em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.019 in mRS shift analysis). Survival and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage did not differ amongst groups.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec4"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Conclusions</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">Our data indicate that primary IVT and/or EVT may be better than primary conservative therapy in patients with LVO in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score. Furthermore, primary EVT was better than secondary EVT in case of neurological deterioration. There is an unmet need for RCTs to find the optimal therapy for this patient group.</p></span>
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the optimal management plan for patients with anterior - circulation large - vessel occlusion (LVO) and an NIHSS score of ≤5 at admission. Specifically, the main purpose of the study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of different initial treatment methods (conservative treatment, intravenous thrombolysis treatment IVT, mechanical thrombectomy treatment EVT) for such patients and compare the effectiveness of these different treatment regimens. ### Research Background For patients with anterior - circulation large - vessel occlusion but a low NIHSS score (≤5), the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. These patients usually present with mild neurological deficits, so conservative treatment is often preferred clinically to avoid the risks that reperfusion treatment may bring. However, studies have shown that about 40% of conservatively - treated patients will experience secondary neurological deterioration (SND), leading to a poor prognosis, especially in the case of persistent large - vessel occlusion. ### Research Methods The research team retrospectively analyzed 185 patients with anterior - circulation large - vessel occlusion and an NIHSS score of ≤5 at admission who were treated in a tertiary hospital from January 2004 to April 2018. According to the initial treatment method, the patients were divided into three groups: - **Conservative treatment group**: Conservative treatment was initially adopted, and if SND occurred, reperfusion treatment (IVT or EVT) was carried out. - **IVT group**: Intravenous thrombolysis treatment was initially adopted, and if SND occurred, EVT was carried out. - **EVT group**: Mechanical thrombectomy treatment was initially adopted, with or without combination with IVT. ### Main Findings - **Incidence of SND**: The incidence of SND was the highest in the conservative treatment group (57.7%), while the incidences of SND in the IVT group and the EVT group were 52.2% and 41.5% respectively. - **Three - month prognosis**: - **Excellent prognosis (mRS 0 - 1)**: The excellent prognosis rates in the EVT group and the IVT group were significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (54.7% and 54.5% vs. 30.8%). - **Good prognosis (mRS 0 - 2)**: The good prognosis rates in the EVT group and the IVT group were also significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (70.3% and 81.8% vs. 63.7%). - **Reperfusion treatment after SND**: Compared with the initial EVT treatment, the prognosis of patients who received reperfusion treatment due to SND was worse. ### Conclusion The research results show that for patients with anterior - circulation large - vessel occlusion and an NIHSS score of ≤5, the prognosis of initial reperfusion treatment (IVT or EVT) is better than that of conservative treatment. In addition, initial EVT treatment is more effective in preventing SND than secondary reperfusion treatment. Although the research results are of certain guiding significance, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still needed to determine the optimal treatment plan.