Abstract:figure legend Neural networks execute the transformation of inputs into the neural activity that enables the execution of a task. Thus, they have the potential to establish causal relationships between the input, the elements of a circuit, the network activity, and eventually behavior. When the purpose of building a model is to understand the mechanisms that enable behavior in biological circuits, the design of network models should be guided by three principles: (1) biological constraints are necessary (e.g., connectivity), (2) the network activity should match the recorded activity, and (3) the network should be able to perform the task of interest. Machine‐learning‐based training can help accomplish these goals. Due to the staggering complexity of the brain and its neural circuitry, neuroscientists rely on the analysis of mathematical models to elucidate its function. From Hodgkin and Huxley's detailed description of the action potential in 1952 to today, new theories and increasing computational power have opened up novel avenues to study how neural circuits implement the computations that underlie behavior. Computational neuroscientists have developed many models of neural circuits that differ in complexity, biological realism, or emergent network properties. With recent advances in experimental techniques for detailed anatomical reconstructions of large‐scale activity recordings, precise biological data has become more available. The challenge when building network models is to reflect experimental results, either through a high level of detail or by finding an appropriate level of abstraction. Meanwhile, machine learning has facilitated the development of artificial neural networks (ANN), which are trained to perform specific tasks. While they have proven successful at achieving task‐oriented behavior, they are often abstract constructs that differ in many features from the physiology of brain circuits. Thus, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying computation in biological circuits can be investigated by analyzing artificial networks that accomplish the same function but differ in their mechanisms. Here, we argue that building biologically realistic network models is crucial to establishing causal relationships between neurons, synapses, circuits, and behavior. More specifically, we advocate for network models that consider the connectivity structure and the recorded activity dynamics while evaluating task performance.

Unifying the essential concepts of biological networks: biological insights and philosophical foundations

Computational Network Biology: Data, Models, and Applications

Introduction to the Special Issue on Approaches to Control Biological and Biologically Inspired Networks

Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization

Network analyses in systems biology: new strategies for dealing with biological complexity

Networks: From Biology to Theory

Network science of biological systems at different scales: A review

Unifying concepts of biological function from molecules to ecosystems

Beyond networks, towards adaptive systems

Structure and Control of Biology-inspired Networks

Biological Network Analysis: Insights into Structure and Functions

Control Principles for Complex Biological Networks.

On the Nature of Explanations Offered by Network Science: A Perspective From and for Practicing Neuroscientists

Current and future directions in network biology

Biological Networks and Some of Their Developments

Classes of Explicit Phylogenetic Networks and their Biological and Mathematical Significance

From inert matter to the global society life as multi-level networks of processes

An Introduction to and Survey of Biological Network Visualization

Network Medicine: From Conceptual Frameworks to Applications and Future Trends

How to incorporate biological insights into network models and why it matters

Modular Organization in a Cell: Concepts and Applications