Abstract:Abstract Background Schizotypy, a subclinical group at risk for schizophrenia, have been found to show impairments in response inhibition. Recent studies differentiated proactive inhibition (a preparatory process before the stimuli appears) and reactive inhibition (the inhibition of a pre-potent or already initiated response). However, it remains unclear whether both proactive and reactive inhibition are impaired in schizotypy and what are the neural mechanisms. The present event-related potential study used an adapted stop-signal task to examine the two inhibition processes and the underlying neural mechanisms in schizotypy compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods A total of 21 individuals with schizotypy and 25 matched HC participated in this study. To explore different degrees of proactive inhibition, we set three conditions: a “certain” go condition which no stop signal occurred, a “17% no go” condition in which stop signal would appear in 17% of trials, and a “33% no go” condition in which stop signal would appear in 33% of trials. All participants completed all the conditions, and EEG was recorded when participants completed the task. Results Behavioral results showed that in both schizotypy and HC, the reaction times (RT) of go trials were significantly prolonged as the no go percentage increased, and HC showed significantly longer go RT compared with schizotypy in both “17% no go” and “33% no go” conditions, suggesting greater proactive inhibition in HC. Stop signal reaction times (SSRTs) in “33% no go” condition was shorter than “17% no go” condition in both groups. Schizotypy showed significantly longer SSRTs in both “17% no go” and “33% no go” conditions than HC, indicating schizotypy relied more on reactive inhibition. ERP results showed that schizotypy showed larger overall N1 for go trials than HC irrespective of condition, which may indicate a compensation process in schizotypy. Schizotypy showed smaller N2 on both successful and unsuccessful stop trials in “17% no go” conditions than HC, while no group difference was found in “33% no go” conditions for stop trials, which may indicate impaired error processing. Discussion These results suggested that schizotypy tended to be impaired in both proactive control and reactive control processes.

Comparison of Intentional Inhibition and Reactive Inhibition in Adolescents and Adults: An ERP Study

Impulse Inhibition in People with Internet Addiction Disorder: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/NoGo Study.

Neural Signatures of Reactive and Intentional Inhibitions: an ERP Study

The response inhibition in adolescents with anxiety disorder:an ERP study on Go/NoGo N2 and P3

Differences in Inhibitory Control Between Impulsive and Premeditated Aggression in Juvenile Inmates

Response Inhibition Impairment In High Functioning Autism And Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence From Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Data

Response inhibition, preattentive processing, and sex difference in young children: an event-related potential study.

Neurophysiological correlates of emotion regulation in children and adolescents

Inhibition control impairments in adolescent smokers: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study

The cognitive neural mechanism of response inhibition and error processing to fearful expressions in adolescents with high reactive aggression

Age-related Spatiotemporal Reorganization During Response Inhibition.

Different Relationships Between Central Dopamine System and Sub-Processes of Inhibition: Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate Relates with N2 but Not P3 in a Go/Nogo Task

Response inhibition function of the frontal lobe in children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder

Choosing to Stop: Responses Evoked by Externally Triggered and Internally Generated Inhibition Identify a Neural Mechanism of Will

12 H Abstinence-Induced ERP Changes in Young Smokers: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/NoGo Study

Inhibition modulated by self-efficacy: An event-related potential study

Delayed modulation of alpha band activity increases response inhibition deficits in adolescents with AD(H)D

A Study on the Neural Mechanism of Inhibition of Return by the Event-Related Potential in the Go/Nogo Task

Response preparation and cognitive control of highly intelligent children: a Go-Nogo event-related potential study.

S76. PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE RESPONSE INHIBITION IN INDIVIDUAL WITH SCHIZOTYPY: AN ERP STUDY

“Free won't” of food in overweight and normal-weight adults: Comparison of neurocognitive correlates of intentional and reactive inhibitions