Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation

Katja E. Luxem,Anne M. L. Kraepiel,Lichun Zhang,Jacob R. Waldbauer,Xinning Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14955
IF: 5.476
2020-02-29
Environmental Microbiology
Abstract:Biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the molybdenum, vanadium and iron‐only nitrogenase metalloenzymes. Studies of purified enzymes showing that the 'alternative' V‐ and Fe‐nitrogenases generally reduce N2 more slowly and produce more byproduct H2 than Mo‐nitrogenase led to the assumption that their usage results in slower growth. Here we show that, in the metabolically versatile photoheterotroph Rhodopseudomonas palustris, rates of diazotrophic growth based on different nitrogenases vary with the type of carbon substrate The V‐nitrogenase supports growth as fast as the Mo‐nitrogenase on acetate, but not on the more oxidized substrate succinate. Our data suggest that this is due to an insufficient electron flux to the V‐nitrogenase isoform in succinate compared to acetate. Despite slightly faster growth based on the V‐nitrogenase in acetate, the wild‐type strain uses exclusively the Mo‐nitrogenase on both carbon substrates. Notably, the differences in H2:N2 stoichiometry by alternative nitrogenases (~1.5 for V‐nitrogenase, ~4–7 for Fe‐nitrogenase) and Mo‐nitrogenase (~1) measured here are lower than prior in vitro estimates. These results indicate that the metabolic costs of alternative V‐based nitrogen fixation could be less significant for growth than previously assumed, helping explain why alternative nitrogenase genes persist in diverse diazotroph lineages and are broadly distributed in the environment.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?