An Assessment of the Response of Sovereign Bond Markets to Asset Purchase Programs

Tarek Chebbi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_50

2020-01-01

Abstract:Face to the financial crisis of 2007–2008, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) decided to reduce its target rate which is considered as the conventional monetary policy tool. By the end of 2008, this rate effectively hit the Zero Lower Bound (ZLB)

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Analysis of the effect of subprime crisis on domestic banks’ investment in foreign currency bonds

Gu Cong,Zhou Bo,Li Shenghong

2008-01-01

Abstract:As the most favorable market in the world in terms of scale and liquidity, the United States fixed-income market attracts foreign investors in pursuit of stable returns. After making a comparison between China and other countries in light of the scale, varieties and features of the investment in America’s fixed-income market, the author focuses on domestic commercial banks’ change in open interest of foreign currency bonds as well as the underlying loss incurred due to the subprime crisis. It is also suggested that commercial banks take more prudent investment measures to cut the investment proportion of risk assets.
The Impact of Recent Central Bank Asset Purchase Programmes

Jack Meaning,Feng Zhu

2011-01-01

Abstract:This article analyses the effectiveness of the asset purchase programmes implemented by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. Both the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchase (LSAP) programme and the Bank of England's Asset Purchase Facility (APF) had a significant impact on financial markets when the first stages were announced, but the effects became smaller for later extensions of the programmes. Applying a methodology developed by D'Amico and King (2010), we estimate that the lasting reduction in bond supply via central bank asset purchases lowered government bond yields significantly. The effect is largely similar for the LSAP and the APF. Our estimations also suggest that the Federal Reserve's new maturity extension programme (MEP) should have an effect on longer-term Treasury bond yields comparable to that of the outright asset purchases under the LSAP.
The Effect of the Federal Reserve’s Securities Holdings on Longer-term Interest Rates

Brian Bonis,Jane E. Ihrig,Min Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3300780

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In an effort to promote more accommodative financial conditions following the financial crisis of 2008 and the ensuing recession, and at a time when the conventional monetary policy tool--the federal funds rate--was at its effective lower bound, the Federal Reserve conducted large-scale asset purchases (LSAPs) and a maturity extension program (MEP). By increasing the amount of longer-term Treasury securities and agency MBS on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, and thereby reducing the amount of longer-term Treasury securities and agency MBS that the public would have held otherwise, these purchase programs put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates. This note outlines a way to estimate by how much Federal Reserve securities holdings resulting from these purchase programs reduce longer-term interest rates. In particular, we estimate the term premium effect (TPE) on the 10-year Treasury yield. Currently, our model suggests that the cumulative effect of the Federal Reserve's LSAPs and MEP results in a reduction in the 10-year Treasury yield term premium of about 100 basis points. By the end of 2017, the term premium will be held down by about 85 basis points. The slight narrowing of the TPE reflects the average maturity of the Federal Reserve's portfolio declining and the cessation of reinvestments drawing nearer.
The Impact of Federal Reserve Asset Purchase Programmes: Another Twist

Jack Meaning,Feng Zhu

2012-01-01

Abstract:This article examines the effectiveness of recent Federal Reserve asset purchase programmes. We estimate that once we control for factors such as the size and the maturity profile of Treasury issuance, the new Maturity Extension Program (MEP) could have an impact comparable to the one we estimate for the Large-Scale Asset Purchase (LSAP) programme. The effectiveness of such programmes is limited by Treasury debt management policy. Indeed, the Treasury’s extension of the average maturity of outstanding debt during LSAP is likely to have pushed up the 10-year bond yield significantly.
How new Fed corporate bond programs cushioned the Covid-19 recession

Michael D Bordo,John V Duca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106413

Abstract:In the financial crisis and recession induced by the Covid-19 pandemic, many investment-grade firms became unable to borrow from securities markets. In response, the Fed not only reopened its commercial paper funding facility but also announced it would purchase newly issued and seasoned corporate bonds rated as investment grade before the Covid pandemic. We assess the effectiveness of this program using long sample periods, spanning the Great Depression through the Great and Covid Recessions. Findings indicate that the announcement of corporate bond backstop facilities helped stop risk premia from rising further than they had by late-March 2020. In doing so, these backstop facilities limited the role of external finance premia in amplifying the macroeconomic impact of the Covid pandemic. Nevertheless, the corporate bond programs blend the roles of the Federal Reserve in conducting monetary policy via its balance sheet, acting as a lender of last resort, and pursuing credit policies.
The Efficacy of Large-Scale Asset Purchases When the Short-Term Interest Rate Is at Its Effective Lower Bound

James D. Hamilton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2018.0016

2018-01-01

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Abstract:The Federal Reserve on net purchased almost $4 trillion in additional securities between March 2009 and December 2014. Although the initial announcements of these policies were associated with dramatic market reactions, these responses were soon reversed. The overall market reaction to news surprises from the Federal Reserve over this period was increases, not decreases, in interest rates. It is hard to disentangle the effects of the purchases themselves from new information about economic fundamentals. My conclusion is that it is difficult to estimate accurately what large-scale asset purchases accomplished, but the magnitude of the effect is likely smaller than commonly believed.

economics
Analysis of Unconventional Monetary Policy of the Federal Reserve after Financial Crisis

Ruihan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/86/20240952

2024-06-28

Abstract:In the 2008 global economic crisis, the United States experienced a severe financial crisis and economic recession. In response to the economic crisis, the Federal Reserve authorities immediately launched a response: some unconventional monetary policies, such as quantitative easing, liquidity tools and so on. But what has been the result of these unconventional monetary policies? What are the implications for the future? By collating and analyzing the annual GDP growth rate, unemployment rate, inflation rate and Gini coefficient of the United States since 2008. It is known that these unconventional monetary policies eased the economic crisis in the short term, stimulated the economy, reduced unemployment and successfully avoided deflation. But at the same time, the implementation of these policies also produced excess financial bubbles, aggravated the structural imbalance of the US economy, and greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor. Therefore, such policies alone cannot be effective in long run. On this basis, it is necessary to cooperate with other economic policies, such as fiscal policies, industrial reforms and industrial policies, to make up for the shortcomings and negative effects of existing policies.
The non-linear effects of the Fed asset purchases

Alessio Anzuini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2020-0022

2021-04-02

Abstract:Abstract The Federal Reserve responded to the great financial crisis deploying new monetary policy tools, the most notable of which being the expansion of its balance sheet. In a recent paper, Weale, M., and T. Wieladek. 2016. “What Are the Macroeconomic Effects of Asset Purchases?” Journal of Monetary Economics 79 (C): 81–93 show that the asset purchases were effective in stimulating economic activity as well as inflation and asset prices. Here I show that their results are state dependent: large scale asset purchase are effective only when financial markets are impaired. Financial markets are under stress when the effective risk-bearing capacity of the financial sector is drastically reduced, i.e. when the excess bond premium (EBP) of Gilchrist, S., and E. Zakrajšek. 2012. “Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations.” The American Economic Review 102 (4): 1692–72 exceed a certain threshold. Using an estimated threshold vector autoregressive model conditional on the EBP regime, I show that an increase in the balance sheet has expansionary effects on GDP and inflation when EBP is high, but not when it is low (as its effects become mostly insignificant). I argue that the high EBP can be interpreted as a proxy of market dis-functioning so that only when this channel of transmission is on, the unconventional policy is particularly effective. This suggests that models of transmission of unconventional policies, based on asset purchases, should focus also on the market functioning channel and not only on the portfolio balance one.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
Credit in a Crisis: Effects of the Fed's Corporate Bond Market Intervention

Sharjil Haque,Richard Varghese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3870678

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We estimate the causal effects of the Federal Reserve’s Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facilities (SMCCF) on corporate bond market liquidity, cost of credit and bond price. Controlling for flight-to-quality induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, we find the SMCCF reduced trade-weighted average bid-ask spreads by 16 basis points and bond yield by 32 basis points but had negligible effect on prices of eligible bonds compared to ineligible bonds. When we refine this analysis using a credit-rating matched difference-in-differences specification, the reduction in bond yield is much larger and we also find a 1.9 percentage point increase in prices on eligible bonds. Finally, we also document that the improvements in liquidity condition and bond price was driven by the announcement of the facilities, while bond yield was driven down by actual purchases of eligible securities. Our results confirm the Fed's intervention helped restore financial stability in the U.S. corporate bond market following disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anatomy of a liquidity crisis: Corporate bonds in the COVID-19 crisis

Maureen O'Hara,Xing (Alex) Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.052

IF: 8.9

2021-10-01

Journal of Financial Economics

Abstract:We examine the microstructure of liquidity provision in the COVID-19 corporate bond liquidity crisis. During the two weeks leading up to Federal Reserve System interventions, volume shifted to liquid securities, transaction costs soared, trade-size pricing inverted, and dealers, particularly non-primary dealers, shifted from buying to selling, causing dealers' inventories to plummet. Liquidity provisions in electronic customer-to-customer trading increased, though at prohibitively high costs. By improving dealer funding conditions and providing a liquidity backstop, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF) stabilized trading conditions. Most of the impact of SMCCF on bond liquidity seems to have materialized following its announcement. We argue that the Federal Reserve's actions reflect a new role as market maker of last resort.

economics,business, finance
The New Tools of Monetary Policy

Ben S. Bernanke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.110.4.943

IF: 10.7

2020-04-01

American Economic Review

Abstract:To overcome the limits on traditional monetary policy imposed by the effective lower bound on short-term interest rates, in recent years the Federal Reserve and other advanced-economy central banks have deployed new policy tools. This lecture reviews what we know about the new monetary tools, focusing on quantitative easing (QE) and forward guidance, the principal new tools used by the Fed. I argue that the new tools have proven effective at easing financial conditions when policy rates are constrained by the lower bound, even when financial markets are functioning normally, and that they can be made even more effective in the future. Accordingly, the new tools should become part of the standard central bank toolkit. Simulations of the Fed’s FRB/US model suggest that, if the nominal neutral interest rate is in the range of 2–3 percent, consistent with most estimates for the United States, then a combination of QE and forward guidance can provide the equivalent of roughly 3 percentage points of policy space, largely offsetting the effects of the lower bound. If the neutral rate is much lower, however, then overcoming the effects of the lower bound may require additional measures, such as a moderate increase in the inflation target or greater reliance on fiscal policy for economic stabilization. (JEL D78, E31, E43, E52, E58, E62)
The FED’s Strategy on a Targets-based Monetary Policy Framework

Florian Gerth,Yiyang Bian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58567/fel02010003

2023-01-01

Abstract:Major economic and financial contractions usually go hand-in-hand with muted inflation. This has been true for the Great Depression, the Global Financial Crisis, as well as the Covid-19 crisis. In this paper, we theoretically highlight and discuss the evolution of instruments and approaches monetary-policy decision makers at the Federal Reserve have in lifting inflation to desired levels in times of the zero-lower bound, paying particular focus on more rigorous developments like asymmetric average inflation and temporary price-level targeting.
Fed and ECB reaction functions during quantitative easing: three phases of monetary policy, both conventional and unconventional

F. J Rodriguez-Rodriguez,A.J. Garzon,L.A. Hierro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.03.003

IF: 2.727

2024-03-23

Journal of Policy Modeling

Abstract:Studying monetary authority response to macroeconomic imbalances using the interest rate as a proxy variable for monetary policy became ineffective after the financial crisis, when central banks exhausted the effective capacity of interest rates by reaching the zero lower bound (ZLB). In an effort to analyse the unconventional response deployed by central banks, we present and estimate a modified reaction function that uses money supply as the operational instrument of monetary policy for the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, and we verify its utility as an explanatory instrument for the behaviour of the two monetary authorities. By applying our strategy, it is feasible to identify both monetary policy reaction with regard to the economic situation as well as other possible monetary authority concerns regarding governments' fiscal behaviour and the evolution of asset markets, regardless of the monetary policy applied at any given time.

economics
Debt financing, the pandemic, and Federal Reserve interventions

Grace E. Arnold,Takeshi Nishikawa,Meredith E. Rhodes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12444

2024-11-02

The Journal of Financial Research

Abstract:Using data on newly issued corporate bonds and syndicated loans, we investigate the effects of the Federal Reserve's interventions during the pandemic on corporate debt activity. We document heterogeneous effects for participation rates across firm credit ratings and debt maturity, consistent with a default risk channel of policy transmission. Investment‐grade firms disproportionately participate in debt markets following the Fed's announcements, which is driven by the riskiest firms (A and BBB ratings). We also find that BBB and BB‐rated firms drive increased participation in short‐term debt markets. These results provide evidence that the Fed's interventions improved credit market access to investment‐grade firms and the highest‐rated noninvestment‐grade firms.

business, finance
Whatever-it-takes policymaking during the pandemic

Kathryn M.E. Dominguez,Andrea Foschi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103915

IF: 3.712

2024-03-15

Journal of International Economics

Abstract:Central banks across the globe introduced large-scale asset purchase programs to address the unprecedented circumstances experienced during the pandemic. Many of these programs were announced as open-ended to shock-and-awe market participants and restore confidence in financial markets. This paper examines whether these whatever-it-takes announcements had larger effects than announcements with explicit limits on scale. We use a narrative approach to categorize announcements made by twenty-two central banks, and event study, propensity-score-matching, and local projection methods to measure the short-term effects of policy announcements on exchange rates and sovereign bond yields. We find that on average a central bank's first whatever-it-takes announcement lowers 10-year bond yields by an additional 47 basis points relative to size-limited announcements, suggesting that communication of potential policy scale matters. Our results for yields hold for both advanced and emerging economies, while exchange rates go in opposing directions, muting their response when we group all countries together.

economics
When and How to Exit Quantitative Easing?

Yi Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.96.243-265

2014-01-01

Review

Abstract:S ince the onset of the financial crisis in late 2007, the Federal Reserve has injected an astronomical amount of money into the economy through its large-scale asset purchase (LSAP) programs. According to former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke (2009, p. 5), the essence of LSAP is “credit easing” (CE)—that is, reducing the cost of private borrowing by direct purchases of privately issued debt instead of government debt. However, given that the government has no intention to hold private debt on its balance sheet forever, at some point the Fed must sell it. The goal of this article is to answer the following questions about the likely effects of the Fed’s exit strategies:
The Federal Reserve's Response to the Global Financial Crisis and Its Long-Term Impact: An Interrupted Time-Series Natural Experimental Analysis

Arnaud Cedric Kamkoum

2023-05-21

Abstract:This paper examines the monetary policies the Federal Reserve implemented in response to the Global Financial Crisis. More specifically, it analyzes the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing (QE) programs, liquidity facilities, and forward guidance operations conducted from 2007 to 2018. The essay's detailed examination of these policies culminates in an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis of the long-term causal effects of the QE programs on U.S. inflation and real GDP. The results of this formal design-based natural experimental approach show that the QE operations positively affected U.S. real GDP but did not significantly impact U.S. inflation. Specifically, it is found that, for the 2011Q2-2018Q4 post-QE period, real GDP per capita in the U.S. increased by an average of 231 dollars per quarter relative to how it would have changed had the QE programs not been conducted. Moreover, the results show that, in 2018Q4, ten years after the beginning of the QE programs, real GDP per capita in the U.S. was 14% higher relative to what it would have been during that quarter had there not been the QE programs. These findings contradict Williamson's (2017) informal natural experimental evidence and confirm the conclusions of VARs and new Keynesian DSGE models that the Federal Reserve's QE policies positively affected U.S. real GDP. The results suggest that the current U.S. and worldwide high inflation rates are likely not because of the QE programs implemented in response to the financial crisis that accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. They are likely due to the unprecedentedly large fiscal stimulus packages used, the peculiar nature of the financial downturn itself, the negative supply shocks from the war in Ukraine, or a combination of these factors. This paper is the first study to measure the macroeconomic effects of QE using a design-based natural experimental approach.

General Economics
The Fed Takes on Corporate Credit Risk: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the SMCCF

Simon Gilchrist,Bin Wei,Zhanwei Yue,Egon Zakrajsek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686961

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We evaluate the efficacy of the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF), a program designed to stabilize the corporate bond market in the wake of the COVID-19 shock. The Fed announced the SMCCF on March 23 and expanded the program on April 9. Regression discontinuity estimates imply that these announcements reduced credit spreads on bonds eligible for purchase 70 basis points. We refine this analysis by constructing a sample of bonds—issued by the same set of companies—which differ in their SMCCF eligibility. A diff-in-diff analysis shows that both announcements had large effects on credit spreads, narrowing spreads 20 basis points on eligible bonds relative to their ineligible counterparts within the same set of issuers across the two announcement periods. TheMarch 23 announcement also reduced bid-ask spreads ten basis points within ten days of the announcement. By lowering credit spreads and improving liquidity, the April 9 announcement had an especially pronounced effect on “fallen angels.” The actual purchases lowered credit spreads by an additional five basis points and bid-ask spreads by two basis points. These results confirm that the SMCCF made it easier for companies to borrow in the corporate bond market.
How the new fed municipal bond facility capped municipal-treasury yield spreads in the Covid-19 recession

Michael D. Bordo,John V. Duca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2022.101245

IF: 1.985

2023-03-01

Journal of the Japanese and International Economies

Abstract:For over two centuries, the municipal (muni) bond market has been a source of systemic risk, which returned early in the Covid-19 downturn when borrowing from securities markets became costly for many private and public entities, and some found it difficult to borrow at all. Indeed, just before the Fed announced its unprecedented intervention into the muni market, spreads of muni over Treasury yields rose in line with the unemployment rate and appeared headed to levels not seen since the Great Depression, when real municipal gross investment plunged 35 percent below 1929 levels. To prevent such a calamity, the Fed created the Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF) to purchase newly issued, (near) investment-grade state and local government bonds at ratings-based interest rate spreads over the safe OIS benchmark yield. In general, these spreads were initially about 100 basis points above average spreads under more normal market conditions and were later lowered by 50 basis points in August 2020. Despite a modest take-up, our study documents the MLF prevented muni spreads from rising much above those margins (plus a modest 10 basis point fee) and limited the extent to which interest rate spreads could have amplified the impact of the Covid pandemic. To establish the MLF the Fed needed Treasury indemnification against default losses. There were concerns about whether the creation of the MLF could induce moral hazard among borrowers and could undermine the efficiency of the bond market if the facility had lasted too long. Partly for this reason and because the muni market had settled down by yearend 2020, the Treasury terminated the MLF at that time. Future assessments of these downside aspects will help answer the question whether the program's benefits addressed here exceeded its costs.

economics,international relations
THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S MONETARY POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS (2008-2020): AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE

André Marques

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v18i1.705

2021-04-27

REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO

Abstract:Este paper tem como objetivo descrever, segundo a Escola Austríaca de Economia, como as políticas monetárias adotadas pelo Federal Reserve a partir de 2008 (Quantitative Easing – QE, Qualitative Easing – QL e Zero Percent Interest Rate Policy – ZIRP) prolongaram os desajustes na alocação de recursos, enfraqueceram a economia americana (indivíduos e empresas tornaram-se mais dependentes de juros artificialmente baixos) e aumentaram os riscos e a alavancagem presentes no mercado financeiro. Argumenta-se que, após a adoção destas políticas, o Fed não seria capaz de normalizar a política monetária, o que se confirmou em 2019, quando Fed voltou a diminuir o FFR e a realizar QE, e, sobretudo, em 2020, quando retornou ao ZIRP e aumentou o QE. Conclui-se, portanto, que o Fed enfraquece a economia e aumenta a alavancagem do mercado financeiro. A economia real é prejudicada em detrimento do mercado financeiro (grandes empresas de capital aberto e instituições financeiras) e do governo (que aumenta seus gastos e endividamento). Palavras-Chave: Escola Austríaca de Economia, Estados Unidos, Bancos Centrais, Federal Reserve, Política Monetária, Ciclos Económicos. Classificação JEL: E14, E32, E43, E44, E52, E58, E62, H60.

An Assessment of the Response of Sovereign Bond Markets to Asset Purchase Programs

Analysis of the effect of subprime crisis on domestic banks’ investment in foreign currency bonds

The Impact of Recent Central Bank Asset Purchase Programmes

The Effect of the Federal Reserve’s Securities Holdings on Longer-term Interest Rates

The Impact of Federal Reserve Asset Purchase Programmes: Another Twist

How new Fed corporate bond programs cushioned the Covid-19 recession

The Efficacy of Large-Scale Asset Purchases When the Short-Term Interest Rate Is at Its Effective Lower Bound

Analysis of Unconventional Monetary Policy of the Federal Reserve after Financial Crisis

The non-linear effects of the Fed asset purchases

Credit in a Crisis: Effects of the Fed's Corporate Bond Market Intervention

Anatomy of a liquidity crisis: Corporate bonds in the COVID-19 crisis

The New Tools of Monetary Policy

The FED’s Strategy on a Targets-based Monetary Policy Framework

Fed and ECB reaction functions during quantitative easing: three phases of monetary policy, both conventional and unconventional

Debt financing, the pandemic, and Federal Reserve interventions

Whatever-it-takes policymaking during the pandemic

When and How to Exit Quantitative Easing?

The Federal Reserve's Response to the Global Financial Crisis and Its Long-Term Impact: An Interrupted Time-Series Natural Experimental Analysis

The Fed Takes on Corporate Credit Risk: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the SMCCF

How the new fed municipal bond facility capped municipal-treasury yield spreads in the Covid-19 recession

THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S MONETARY POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS (2008-2020): AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE