Abstract:BackgroundWe developed a novel system for quantifying DNA damage response (DDR) to help diagnose and predict the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). MethodsWe thoroughly estimated the DDR patterns in AD patients Using 179 DDR regulators. Single-cell techniques were conducted to validate the DDR levels and intercellular communications in cognitively impaired patients. The consensus clustering algorithm was utilized to group 167 AD patients into diverse subgroups after a WGCNA approach was employed to discover DDR-related lncRNAs. The distinctions between the categories in terms of clinical characteristics, DDR levels, biological behaviors, and immunological characteristics were evaluated. For the purpose of choosing distinctive lncRNAs associated with DDR, four machine learning algorithms, including LASSO, SVM-RFE, RF, and XGBoost, were utilized. A risk model was established based on the characteristic lncRNAs. ResultsThe progression of AD was highly correlated with DDR levels. Single-cell studies confirmed that DDR activity was lower in cognitively impaired patients and was mainly enriched in T cells and B cells. DDR-related lncRNAs were discovered based on gene expression, and two different heterogeneous subtypes (C1 and C2) were identified. DDR C1 belonged to the non-immune phenotype, while DDR C2 was regarded as the immune phenotype. Based on various machine learning techniques, four distinctive lncRNAs associated with DDR, including FBXO30-DT, TBX2-AS1, ADAMTS9-AS2, and MEG3 were discovered. The 4-lncRNA based riskScore demonstrated acceptable efficacy in the diagnosis of AD and offered significant clinical advantages to AD patients. The riskScore ultimately divided AD patients into low- and high-risk categories. In comparison to the low-risk group, high-risk patients showed lower DDR activity, accompanied by higher levels of immune infiltration and immunological score. The prospective medications for the treatment of AD patients with low and high risk also included arachidonyltrifluoromethane and TTNPB, respectively, ConclusionsIn conclusion, immunological microenvironment and disease progression in AD patients were significantly predicted by DDR-associated genes and lncRNAs. A theoretical underpinning for the individualized treatment of AD patients was provided by the suggested genetic subtypes and risk model based on DDR.

Contributions of DNA Damage to Alzheimer’s Disease

Progress in molecular mechanisms of β-amyloid peptides in alzheimer's disease

DNA Damage Accumulation in Aging Brain and Its Links to Alzheimer’s Disease Progression

DNA Damage and Senescence in the Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Cortex Are Not Uniformly Distributed

Mitochondrial DNA Damage as a Mechanism of Cell Loss in Alzheimer's Disease

An Epigenetic Manifestation of Alzheimer's Disease: DNA Methylation

Adaptive and Maladaptive DNA Breaks in Neuronal Physiology and Alzheimer's Disease

Loss of Adaptive DNA Breaks in Alzheimer's Disease Brains

DNA methylation: The epigenetic mechanism of Alzheimer's disease

Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: From pathogenesis to clinical usage

Epigenetic Modification and Its Role in Alzheimer's Disease

Epigenetic modifications of DNA and RNA in Alzheimer's disease

DNA Damage in Peripheral Blood Cells is Associated with Alzheimer's Disease (Ad)-Related Plasma Proteins in Individuals at Risk for Progression to AD

State of Play in Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics

Integration of Bulk RNA Sequencing and Single-Cell Analysis Reveals a Global Landscape of DNA Damage Response in the Immune Environment of Alzheimer's Disease

Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease

Associations Between Dna Damage, Dna Base Excision Repair Gene Variability And Alzheimer'S Disease Risk

Genomics and Functional Genomics of Alzheimer’s Disease

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Alzheimer¢s Disease

Epigenetics in Alzheimer’s Disease: Perspective of DNA Methylation