Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aim</h3><p>Idealized metacommunity structures (i.e. checkerboard, random, quasi‐structures, nested, Clementsian, Gleasonian and evenly spaced) have recently gained increasing attention, but their relationships with environmental heterogeneity and how they vary with organism groups remain poorly understood. Here, we tested two main hypotheses: (a) gradient‐driven patterns (Clementsian and Gleasonian) occur frequently in heterogeneous environments and (b) small organisms (here, diatoms) are more likely to exhibit gradient‐driven patterns than large organisms (here, macroinvertebrates).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Location</h3><p>Streams in three regions in China.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Taxon</h3><p>Diatoms and macroinvertebrates.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The stream diatom and macroinvertebrate data, as well as the environmental data collected from the same set of sites were used to examine the idealized metacommunity structures via the elements of the metacommunity structure (EMS; coherence, turnover and boundary clumping) analysis in three regions. We extended the traditional EMS approach by ordering sites along known environmental gradients.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>We found that Clementsian structure with high degrees of coherence and turnover, and significantly positive clumping was typically observed in the high‐heterogeneity regions, whereas randomness was prevalent in the low‐heterogeneity region. Macroinvertebrates exhibited clearer Clementsian structures compared with diatoms, while diatoms showed more randomness compared with macroinvertebrates, indicating a stronger role of environmental filtering for macroinvertebrates than diatoms. In most cases, the results of the more novel EMS approach differed from the results of the traditional EMS technique.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Main conclusions</h3><p>Our results suggested that the occurrence of different metacommunity structures may be related with the degree of regional environmental heterogeneity. However, diatom metacommunities were more random than those of macroinvertebrate, and such an unexpected result may result from different dispersal abilities between the two organism groups. In addition, we found that the novel EMS approach increased power in discerning metacommunity structure in comparison to the traditional EMS technique.</p></section>

Metacommunity Structure of Stream Insects across Three Hierarchical Spatial scales

Environmental Factors Override Dispersal-Related Factors in Shaping Diatom and Macroinvertebrate Communities Within Stream Networks in China

Seasonal changes in metacommunity assembly mechanisms of benthic macroinvertebrates in a subtropical river basin

The effects of dispersal ability on metacommunity structure of macroinvertebrates in subtropical Chinese high-mountain streams: seasonal shifts in relative contribution of local environment and spatial processes

The relative importance of abiotic, biotic, and spatial factors in structuring the stream macroinvertebrate metacommunity in a temperate rainforest

Understanding macroinvertebrate metacommunity organization using a nested study design across a mountainous river network

Patterns in aquatic metacommunities are associated with environmental and trait heterogeneity

Effects of connectivity, dispersal directionality and functional traits on the metacommunity structure of river benthic diatoms

Spatiotemporal metacommunity structures and beta diversity of macroinvertebrates in stream and lake systems

Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure

Elements of metacommunity structure of diatoms and macroinvertebrates within stream networks differing in environmental heterogeneity

Environmental Filtering and Spatial Processes Equally Contributed to Macroinvertebrate Metacommunity Dynamics in the Highly Urbanized River Networks in Shenzhen,South China

Distance decay of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a mountain river network: Do dispersal routes and dispersal ability matter?

Connecting local and regional scales with stochastic metacommunity models: Competition, ecological drift, and dispersal

Spatio‐temporal variation of macroinvertebrate metacommunity organization in a monsoon‐climate region

Influences of Dispersal and Local Environmental Factors on Stream Macroinvertebrate Communities in Qinjiang River, Guangxi, China

The Role of Environmental and Spatial Processes in Structuring Stream Macroinvertebrates Communities in A Large River Basin

Spatial processes dominate the metacommunity structure and diversity of macroinvertebrates in the waters of eastern China

Relative importance of spatial processes and environmental factors in shaping alpine meadow communities

Environmental and Spatial Effects on Co‐Occurrence Network Size and Taxonomic Similarity in Stream Diatoms, Insects and Fish

Spatial Structures of the Environment and of Dispersal Impact Species Distribution in Competitive Metacommunities.