Cultural patterns and practices related to food in everyday life
A. Becuț,Angelica Marinescu,Jean-Jacques Boutaud
Abstract:more, reason to Roland Barthes who, in his introduction to Brillat Savarin’s Physiologie du goût, understands food, generally (and gastronomy, particularly) as a domain fit for developing a humanistic approach, seen as total social fact, including different metalanguages. As he explains, ‘It is this encyclopedic view, – this ”humanism” that encompasses, for Brillat-Savarin, the name of gastronomy” (Barthes, 1975). But if gastronomy is, above all, a speech act, food represents firstly a culture act. This means that the way we understand and we relate to food, food practices, is always related to our identity, in the deepest manner. The danger that comes along with this approach is to understand these fundamental dimensions – identity, food, culture – on their ontological or essentialist dimension, shifting from identity to the identification with the good, the best, the ideal in culinary or in gastronomy. Because food embodies this permanent dialectics between the attachments to our origins’ model, with its emblematic, or totemic dishes, its recipes, its rituals and practices, and, the other way around, the need to ceaselessly explore, seeking new tastes, new savories, new recipes, or manners of doing and being. Food is caught in this dialectics of withdrawal, of return to the origins, to tradition, and at the same time, the opposite, of exploring, discovering, looking for the surprise, ‘the search for the unexpected’, to quote Floch (1995). The relation to food and culture translates the tension that defines our identity construction between finding refuge in a frame, in order to retrieve our own being, and escaping from this frame and discovering oneself throughout new worlds of flavors and sensations. This oscillation is sustained by two identity dimensions which are at the heart of the relationship between food and culture: a narrative dimension (Ricoeur) and a figurative dimension (Fontanille). On the narrative level, eating means living and meeting, being himself or herself and becoming another. Identity and alterity (Stano), based on a constant relating to the other, from attraction to repulsion, with all the variations from good to bad taste, or even distaste (Assouly). On the figurative DOI 10.1515/irsr-2016-0001 Received: March 1, 2016; Accepted: April 29, 2016
Environmental Science