Abstract:Background To promote chronic adaptations, resistance training needs the manipulation of different variables, among them, the order of the exercises and sets. Specifically, for velocity-based training, paired exercises alternating upper and/or lower-body muscle groups appear to be a good choice to promote neuromuscular adaptations. Objective This study aimed to compare the effect of two velocity-based training programs only differing in the set configuration on muscle strength, muscular endurance and jump performance. Methods Moderately strength-trained men were allocated into a traditional (TS, n= 8) or alternating sets (AS, n= 9) configuration group to perform a 6-week velocity-based training program using the full squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises. The TS group completed all sets of the full squat (SQ) exercise before performing the bench press (BP) sets, whereas the AS group completed the first set of each exercise in an alternating manner. Training frequency, relative load, number of sets, percentage of velocity loss (%VL) within the set and inter-set rest were matched for both groups. Countermovement jump height (CMJ), load (kg)-velocity relationship, predicted 1RM, and muscular endurance for each exercise were evaluated at pre- and post-training. Results The TS and AS groups obtained similar and non-significant improvements in CMJ (3.01 ± 4.84% and 3.77 ± 6.12%, respectively). Both groups exhibited significant and similar increases in muscle strength variables in SQ (6.19–11.55% vs. 6.90-011.76%; p = 0.033–0.044, for TS and AS, respectively), BP (6.19–13.87% and 3.99–9.58%; p = 0.036–0.049, for TS and AS group, respectively), and muscular endurance in BP (7.29 ± 7.76% and 7.72 ± 9.73%; p = 0.033, for the TS and AS group, respectively). However, the AS group showed a greater improvement in muscular endurance in SQ than the TS group (10.19 ± 15.23% vs. 2.76 ± 7.39%; p = 0.047, respectively). Total training time per session was significantly shorter ( p = 0.000) for AS compared to TS group. Conclusions Training programs performing AS between SQ and BP exercises with moderate loads and %VL induce similar jump and strength improvements, but in a more time-efficient manner, than the traditional approach.

Cluster vs. traditional training programmes: changes in the force–velocity relationship

Influence of a Cluster Set Configuration on the Adaptations to Short-Term Power Training

Cluster Versus Rest-Redistribution Training: Similar Improvements in Neuromuscular Capacities in Female Team-Sport Athletes

Power-oriented resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training in pre-frail and frail older people: comparison between traditional and cluster training set configurations on the force–velocity relationship, physical function and frailty

Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: Levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold

The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute Responses to Traditional and Cluster-Set Squat Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction

Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming

Effects of Cluster Sets and Rest-Redistribution on Mechanical Responses to Back Squats in Trained Men

Acute mechanical, physiological and perceptual responses in older men to traditional-set or different cluster-set configuration resistance training protocols

The Effects of Cluster Sets Resistance Training on Delayed Potentiation of Lower Limb Power Output in Male Collegiate Athletes

Large inter-individual variability in force-velocity profile changes in response to acute high-load resistance training

The effects of varying resistance-training loads on intermediate- and high-velocity-specific adaptations

Cluster Training: A Novel Method for Introducing Training Program Variation

Upper-lower body super-sets vs. traditional sets for inducing chronic athletic performance improvements

Adaptations in athletic performance and muscle architecture are not meaningfully conditioned by training free-weight versus machine-based exercises: Challenging a traditional assumption using the velocity-based method

Effect of velocity loss during squat training on neuromuscular performance

The effectiveness of adjusting resistance training loads through velocity-based techniques in experienced sprinters: a case series study

Effects of Four Different Velocity-Based Training Programming Models on Strength Gains and Physical Performance

Should we individualize training based on force‐velocity profiling to improve physical performance in athletes?

High-speed resistance training in elderly women: Effects of cluster training sets on functional performance and quality of life