Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries
Michael Hameleers,Linda Bos,Nayla Fawzi,Carsten Reinemann,Ioannis Andreadis,Nicoleta Corbu,Christian Schemer,Anne Schulz,Tamir Shaefer,Toril Aalberg,Sofia Axelsson,Rosa Berganza,Cristina Cremonesi,Stefan Dahlberg,Claes H. de Vreese,Agnieszka Hess,Evangelia Kartsounidou,Dominika Kasprowicz,Joerg Matthes,Elena Negrea-Busuioc,Signe Ringdal,Susana Salgado,Karen Sanders,Desirée Schmuck,Jesper Stromback,Jane Suiter,Hajo Boomgaarden,Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt,Naama Weiss-Yaniv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218786786
2018-08-02
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Abstract:Although populist communication has become pervasive throughout Europe, many important questions on its political consequences remain unanswered. First, previous research has neglected the differential effects of populist communication on the Left and Right. Second, internationally comparative studies are missing. Finally, previous research mostly studied attitudinal outcomes, neglecting behavioral effects. To address these key issues, this paper draws on a unique, extensive, and comparative experiment in sixteen European countries ( N = 15,412) to test the effects of populist communication on political engagement. The findings show that anti-elitist populism has the strongest mobilizing effects, and anti-immigrant messages have the strongest demobilizing effects. Moreover, national conditions such as the level of unemployment and the electoral success of the populist Left and Right condition the impact of populist communication. These findings provide important insights into the persuasiveness of populist messages spread throughout the European continent.