Late Holocene thermohaline perturbation of the N-Atlantic Subpolar Gyre linked to exceptional Greenland Ice Sheet melting between 4.4 and 4.0 ka BP

Antoon Kuijpers,Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz,Ralph Schneider,Camilla S. Andresen,Signe Hygom Jacobsen,Mimmi Oksman,Lisa C. Orme,Jian Ren,Sandrine Solignac
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3103
2020-03-23
Abstract:<p>Knowledge of the impact of past climate warming on Greenland Ice Sheet stability is an important issue for assessing  thresholds that are critical for a potential ice sheet collapse. For the late Holocene, evidence has recently been found of a so-called 4.2 ka BP event(1) including a prominent warming spike in several ice core records from Greenland and Canada (Agassiz).  Also lake records from both Northwest(2) and South Greenland(3) support pronounced summer warming during that time. After c. 4.0 ka BP NW Greenland July air temperature dropped by about 3<sup>o</sup> C. Coeval with this exceptional atmospheric warming anomaly over northern Canada and parts of Greenland, abrupt cooling and freshening affected  the N-Atlantic subpolar gyre where Labrador Sea deep convection ceased(4). Northern N-Atlantic climate generally deteriorated. With our contribution we present Holocene sub-bottom profiling  and sedimentary shelf and  fjord records from Southwest Greenland and Disko Bay that indicate exceptional Greenland Ice Sheet melting 4.4-4.0 ka BP at a rate and magnitude not recorded since early Holocene deglaciation. Extremely strong melt water discharge resulted in erosion of fjord sediments(5) and local deposition of up to several meters thick meltwater sediment on the shelf(6-8).  Timing of this melting event corresponds to a significant anomaly in hydrographic parameters of the Labrador Current off Newfoundland(9,10), which is concluded to have resulted in thermohaline perturbation of the N-Atlantic Subpolar gyre.   </p><ul><li>(1) Weiss, H. 2019. Clim Past doi:10.5194/cp-2018-162-RC2</li> <li>(2) McFarlin, J.M. et al. 2018. PNAS doi:10.1073/pnas.1720420115</li> <li>(3) Andresen, C.S. et al. 2004. J Quat Sci 19(8) doi:10.1002/jqs.886</li> <li>(4) Klus, A. et al. 2018. Clim Past doi:10.5194/cp-14-1165-2018</li> <li>(5) Ren, J. et al. 2009. Mar Micropal doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.12.003</li> <li>(6) Hygom Jacobsen, S. 2019. Master Thesis Aarhus Univ, Dept. of Geoscience, pp105</li> <li>(7) Schneider, R. 2015. Cruise Rep epic.awi.de/id/eprint/37062/131/msm-44-46-expeditionsheft.pdf</li> <li>(8) Kuijpers, A. et al. 2001. Geol. Greenland Surv Bull 189, 41-47</li> <li>(9) Solignac, S. et al. 2011. The Holocene, doi: 10.1177/0959683610385720</li> <li>(10) Orme, L. et al 2019. The Holocene (submitted)</li> </ul>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?