Gender Differences in the Strategies Used for Task Completion: An Analysis of Marathon Runners

Eric J. Allen,Patricia Dechow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536645
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We examine the strategies adopted by people completing a well-defined but challenging task: running a marathon. We investigate whether the goal of a non-binding round number finish time (e.g., 3:00 hours) motivates runners to engage in more optimal running strategies to improve their performance on race day. Unconditionally, males undertake riskier running strategies than females, increasing the likelihood of a fast finish time but also increasing the risk of a poor race outcome. However, males who have round number time goals are motivated to improve their expected performance: they run with an even-paced strategy and conserve energy to speed up at the end of the race. In contrast, females run more conservatively than males, are less focused on round number times as goals, and will only minimally change their running strategies to beat a round number. These findings suggest that having a non-binding time goal is relatively more helpful for males than females, because it combats the male tendency for overconfidence. Overall, our results suggest that the genders differ in the strategies adopted to complete tasks and non-binding, challenging goals have a relatively greater impact on male performance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?