Monitoring natural CO2 flow in the mofettes of the West Bohemia seismoactive region

Josef Vlček,Tomáš Fischer,Martin Lanzendörfer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19156
2020-03-23
Abstract:<p>Monitoring of CO2 degassing in seismoactive areas allows the study of correlations of gas<br>release and seismic activity. Reliable continuous monitoring of the gas flow rate in rough field<br>conditions requires robust methods capable of measuring gas flow at different types of gas<br>outlets such as wet mofettes, mineral springs and boreholes. In this paper we focus on the<br>methods and results of the long-term monitoring of CO2 degassing in the West<br>Bohemia/Vogtland region in Central Europe, which is typified by the occurrence of<br>earthquake swarms and emanations of carbon dioxide of magmatic origin. Besides direct<br>flow measurement using flowmeters, we introduce a novel indirect technique based on<br>quantifying the gas bubble contents in a water column, which is capable of functioning in<br>severe environmental conditions. The method calculates the mean bubble fraction in a water-<br>gas mixture from the pressure difference along a fixed depth interval in a water column.<br>Laboratory tests indicate the nonlinear dependence of the bubble fraction on the flow rate,<br>which is confirmed by empirical models found in the chemical and nuclear engineering<br>literature. Application of the method in a pilot borehole shows a high correlation between the<br>bubble fraction and measured gas flow rate. This was specifically the case of two coseismic<br>anomalies in 2008 and 2014, when the flow rate rose during a seismic swarm to a multitude<br>of the pre-seismic level for several months and was followed by a long-term flow rate decline.<br>However, three more seismic swarms occurring in the same fault zone were not associated<br>with any significant CO2 flow anomaly. We surmise that this could be related to the slightly<br>farther distance of the hypocenters of these swarms than the two ones which caused the<br>coseismic CO2 flow rise. Further long-term CO2-flow monitoring is required to verify the<br>mutual influence of CO2 degassing and seismic activity in the area.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?