Abstract:Objective To compare the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion(LF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis.Methods From January 2010 to June 2014,54 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis underwent surgical treatment.Among them,29 patients were underwent ACDF,and 25 patients were underwent LF in Department of spine surgery,Tianjin Union Medical Centre.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fusion segments,Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA)score,Neck Disability Index (NDI),Visual Analog Scale (VAS),change of cervical curvature,range of motion (ROM)and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results Mean operative time was (162.7 ± 21.3) min in the anterior approach group versus (176.3 ± 29.8) min in the posterior group(P ＞ 0.05).Mean intraoperative blood loss was (135.6 ± 27.8)ml in the anterior approach group and (255.2 ±32.3)ml in the posterior approach group(P ＜0.05).Mean fusion levels are (4.1 ±0.3)in the anterior approach group and (5.3 ±0.5) in the posterior approach group (P＜0.05).The mean preoperative JOA score were(8.3 ± 2.7)in the anterior approach group and(8.9 ± 2.1) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative JOA score were (13.6 ± 2.5) in the anterior approach group and (14.0 ± 1.7) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean improvement rate was (55.7％ ± 16.3％) in the anterior approach group and (58.3％ ± 15.7％) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean preoperative NDI score were (33.8 ± 11.0) in the anterior approach group and (34.4 ± 8.7) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative NDI score were (16.9 ±7.5) in the anterior approach group and (15.5 ±8.1) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean VAS score were (2.9 ± 1.5) in the anterior approach group and (2.5 ± 1.0)in the posterior approach group before operation(P ＞0.05),they are improved to (1.2 ± 1.2) and (1.2 ±1.3),respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean Cobb angle of the operative site were (-24.3 ± 4.4)° in the anterior approach group and (-22.7 ± 3.7) ° in the posterior approach group before operation (P ＞ 0.05).At final follow-up,the Cobb angle of the operative site were (13.7 ± 3.2)° in the anterior approach group and (6.2 ± 4.2) ° in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.01).Mean preoperative ROM were (29.0 ± 6.7) ° and (30.4 ±5.4)° in the anterior approach group and posterior approach group,respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative ROM were (11.7 ±6.5) ° and (8.2 ± 5.9) °in the anterior approach group and the posterior approach group,respectively(P ＜ 0.05).There were 16 patients with complications in the anterior approach group and 7 patients with complications in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion For multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis,ACDF can restore the lordosis better,fuse less levels but have more complications compared with LF.Patients treated with LF can get as good life quality as with ACDF and have less complications although fuse more levels compared with ACDF.

A meta-analysis of prospective studies comparing the results of laminoplasty and laminectomy with instrumental fixation in the surgical treatment of patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine diseases

Meta-analysis of posterior laminectomy and instrumented fusion versus laminoplasty in treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of laminoplasty combined with C3 laminectomy for patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: an Updated Meta-Analysis

Comparison of the surgeries for the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-related cervical spondylosis A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis and literature review

A prospective randomized trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus plate-only open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseases

1075 The Effect of Regional Procedural Preference on Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of a Prospective, Multinational Dataset of 1047 Cases

Comparison of the Surgeries for the Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament-Related Cervical Spondylosis

Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy]

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multisegment Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Surgical Outcomes Between Three Types of Modified Muscle-Sparing Laminoplasty and Conventional Laminoplasty for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Comparison of 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and open-door laminoplasty in cervical sagittal balance: A retrospective study

Comparison of the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis

Mini-plate fixation versus suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: A meta-analysis.

Laminoplasty with foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myeloradiculopathy

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Comparison of efficacy of laminoplasty and laminectomy combined with lateral mass screw fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

Comparative results between posterior laminoplasty with foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculomyelopathy