Seasonal analysis of photosynthetic limitations in mature Scots pine trees reveals that models based on intracellular CO2 concentration grossly underestimate photosynthetic capacity

Zsofia R. Stangl,Lasse Tarvainen,Mats Räntfors,Göran Wallin,John D. Marshall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-15489
2020-03-23
Abstract:<p><span>Global models of photosynthesis commonly use photosynthetic capacity parameters (V<sub>cmax</sub>, J<sub>max</sub>) that are estimated based on C<sub>i</sub>, the intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. The underlying assumption of these models is that mesophyll conductance (gm) is infinite and therefore the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the site of carboxylation (C<sub>c</sub>) is equal to C<sub>i</sub>, despite a growing body of literature acknowledging that these assumptions are incorrect. Because relatively few studies on gm have been conducted under natural conditions and with high enough resolution, it is currently unclear how significant the assumption of infinite C<sub>c</sub> is for the accuracy of long-term predictions by large-scale photosynthesis models. In this study we investigated this question with data collected in a mature Scots pine stand, one of the dominant species of the boreal region. We conducted high-resolution gas-exchange and online <sup>13</sup>C discrimination measurements over a whole growing season (May-October), and analysed the relative contribution of diffusional and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis. We hypothesised that diffusional limitation will be significant in this species, as conifers typically have low stomatal and mesophyll conductance (g<sub>s</sub> and g<sub>m</sub> respectively). Accordingly, we found that diffusional limitations were similar or stronger than biochemical limitation during May-July, and that all limitations reached minima around the end of June when A<sub>net</sub> values were highest. However, during August-October biochemical limitation became increasingly dominant, as the diffusional limitations were relatively small and stable. Over the whole period, both g<sub>m</sub> and the relative mesophyll limitation were similar in magnitude to g<sub>s</sub> and the stomatal limitation, respectively, resulting in a 40-100 ppm reduction in CO2 concentration between C<sub>i</sub> and C<sub>c</sub>. This meant that V<sub>cmax</sub> was under-estimated by 20-40% when calculated from C<sub>i</sub>compared to C<sub>c</sub>, highlighting the importance of accounting for the finite g<sub>m </sub>when determining photosynthetic capacity and modelling photosynthesis under natural conditions.</span></p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?